Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g of the votes or debates of the legislature without prior authorization<br />
by the Speaker. Thus, even prior censorship on publication cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />
throughout the colonial period <strong>in</strong> the vital field of <strong>in</strong>formation on the<br />
proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the legislature. In 1753, the pr<strong>in</strong>ter Hugh Ga<strong>in</strong>e published<br />
the k<strong>in</strong>g's <strong>in</strong>structions to the new governor of New York as well as the<br />
latter's speech to the Assembly. Immediately the Assembly summoned<br />
Ga<strong>in</strong>e and demanded to know how he dared pr<strong>in</strong>t any part of the proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
without license or prior approval. Humbly abas<strong>in</strong>g himself, the startled<br />
Ga<strong>in</strong>e was released by the Assembly but only after it forced him to pay the<br />
costs of the case.<br />
A more serious case occurred <strong>in</strong> 1756, when James Parker published an<br />
article on the depressed conditions of the country <strong>in</strong> his New York Gazette.<br />
The Assembly took this to be a grave reflection on itself, and summarily<br />
voted Parker and his assistant to be guilty of high misdemeanor and contempt<br />
of authority. Seized and hauled <strong>in</strong>to the Assembly, the frightened<br />
Parker and his aide abjectly confessed their guilt and begged pardon, and<br />
showed their good faith by <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g on the Reverend Hezekiah Watk<strong>in</strong>s<br />
of Newburgh as author of the offend<strong>in</strong>g article. Despite their abasement,<br />
the editors were put <strong>in</strong>to jail for a week by the Assembly, which also moved,<br />
of course, for the immediate arrest of the unfortunate m<strong>in</strong>ister. The Reverend<br />
Mr. Watk<strong>in</strong>s proved to be no more heroic than his editors, begg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
forgiveness for his misplaced zeal. He too was jailed by the Assembly.<br />
Watk<strong>in</strong>s was discharged the next day but only after be<strong>in</strong>g forced to pay the<br />
costs of his case.<br />
Two years later, Samuel Townsend, justice of the peace <strong>in</strong> Queens County,<br />
sent a petition to the Speaker of the lower house ask<strong>in</strong>g for relief for some<br />
refugees stationed on Long Island. The Speaker denounced Townsend's<br />
letter as "<strong>in</strong>solent" and the Assembly then promptly ordered his appearance.<br />
When Townsend bravely failed to heed the summons, he was cited for<br />
contempt, seized, and hauled before the Assembly. Townsend surpris<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
failed to show the usual abject humility. The enraged Assembly voted him<br />
clearly guilty of a high misdemeanor and "most dar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sult" and threw him<br />
<strong>in</strong>to prison. In this atmosphere, Townsend had ample opportunity to reflect<br />
on the error of his ways, and soon sent the house a profound apology and a<br />
promise to avoid all such misconduct <strong>in</strong> the future. The Assembly then<br />
graciously released Judge Townsend.<br />
It is certa<strong>in</strong>ly significant that of the hapless defendants appear<strong>in</strong>g before<br />
the New York Assembly twenty years after Zenger, none bothered to justify<br />
himself on the basis of liberty of the press. Editor James Parker, battl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for his own conception of freedom of the press <strong>in</strong> 1759, summoned up the<br />
most enlightened of American op<strong>in</strong>ion: "<strong>Liberty</strong> truly reigns," wrote Parker,<br />
where "everyone hath a privilege of declar<strong>in</strong>g his sentiments upon all topics<br />
with the utmost freedom, provided he does it with proper decency and a just<br />
150