24.07.2013 Views

Disclaimer note - WWF - Pakistan

Disclaimer note - WWF - Pakistan

Disclaimer note - WWF - Pakistan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Detailed Ecological Assessment Report 2008 – Keenjhar Lake<br />

Figure 26 – Percentage of species recorded over season and against feeding habits<br />

% of species recorded<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

44.6<br />

55.3<br />

50 50<br />

<strong>WWF</strong> <strong>Pakistan</strong> – Indus for All Programme Page 129 of 188<br />

53.8<br />

46.1<br />

53.3<br />

46.6<br />

Grainivore Herbivore Insectivore Omnivore<br />

Feeding habit<br />

Summer<br />

Winter<br />

4.2.3 Habitat<br />

Over the fives sites agriculture habitat supported the most species with more than<br />

50% of all records being taken from agriculture habitats followed by sandy<br />

habitats (23%). The remaining water, tree and open habitats up the outstanding<br />

27%. Figure 27 shows the percentage of species found in each habitat. This<br />

result indicates that agriculture land plays an important role in maintaining the<br />

ecosystem, despite it being a man-e ecosystem. The fact that open land<br />

supported very few small mammal species also suggests that some minimum<br />

vegetative cover is required to support a diversity of small mammals.<br />

% of species found in habitat<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Figure 27 – Number of species observed according the habitat<br />

55.1<br />

8.6<br />

8.6<br />

3.4<br />

24.1<br />

Agriculture Water Aboreal<br />

Habitat type<br />

Open land Sandy<br />

4.2.4 Status of small mammals across the survey sites<br />

All the small mammals recorded during the survey were categorized as Common<br />

or of Least Concern. There are no rare, endangered or endemic species though<br />

many parts of the country are data deficient for several species so these<br />

categories are still quite speculative. There was no obvious trend or dominance of<br />

the two categories except in Keti Bunder where species if Less Concern were<br />

more dominant that Common species and vice versa in Keenjhar Lake where<br />

Common species were more dominant. Figure’s 28 and 29 show the results over<br />

site and season.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!