Disclaimer note - WWF - Pakistan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Detailed Ecological Assessment Report 2008 – Keenjhar Lake Figure 26 – Percentage of species recorded over season and against feeding habits % of species recorded 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 44.6 55.3 50 50 WWF Pakistan – Indus for All Programme Page 129 of 188 53.8 46.1 53.3 46.6 Grainivore Herbivore Insectivore Omnivore Feeding habit Summer Winter 4.2.3 Habitat Over the fives sites agriculture habitat supported the most species with more than 50% of all records being taken from agriculture habitats followed by sandy habitats (23%). The remaining water, tree and open habitats up the outstanding 27%. Figure 27 shows the percentage of species found in each habitat. This result indicates that agriculture land plays an important role in maintaining the ecosystem, despite it being a man-e ecosystem. The fact that open land supported very few small mammal species also suggests that some minimum vegetative cover is required to support a diversity of small mammals. % of species found in habitat 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Figure 27 – Number of species observed according the habitat 55.1 8.6 8.6 3.4 24.1 Agriculture Water Aboreal Habitat type Open land Sandy 4.2.4 Status of small mammals across the survey sites All the small mammals recorded during the survey were categorized as Common or of Least Concern. There are no rare, endangered or endemic species though many parts of the country are data deficient for several species so these categories are still quite speculative. There was no obvious trend or dominance of the two categories except in Keti Bunder where species if Less Concern were more dominant that Common species and vice versa in Keenjhar Lake where Common species were more dominant. Figure’s 28 and 29 show the results over site and season.
Detailed Ecological Assessment Report 2008 – Keenjhar Lake Figure 28 – Percentage of species recorded across sites against status categories % of species recorded 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 22 30 25 19 Keti Bunder Keenjhar Lake 21 23 23 21 WWF Pakistan – Indus for All Programme Page 130 of 188 10 Chotiari Pai Forest Keti Shah Site 3 Common Less concern Figure 29 – Percentage of species recorded across season against status categories % of species recorded 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 53.8 46 46 53 Summer Winter Season Common Least concern
Page 2 and 3:
Disclaimer note This information sh
Page 4 and 5:
Detailed Ecological Assessment Repo
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
List of tables Detailed Ecological
Page 10 and 11:
List of figures Detailed Ecological
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
42 Leiognathus splendens Leiognathi
Page 90 and 91:
64 Rastrelliger kanagurta Scombrida
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101: Detailed Ecological Assessment Repo
Page 112 and 113: Mukhtar, 1988 14 Narejo, 1996 Detai
Page 154 and 155: S. No. Detailed Ecological Assessme
Page 168 and 169: Index value 0.96 0.94 0.92 Detailed
Page 170 and 171: Comparison value 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
show all

Disclaimer note - WWF - Pakistan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?