Disclaimer note - WWF - Pakistan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Detailed Ecological Assessment Report 2008 – Keenjhar Lake Figure 33 – Biodiversity Index of bird species during summer across all sites 30% 10% 10% WWF Pakistan – Indus for All Programme Page 143 of 188 10% 40% Keti Bunder Keenjhar Lake Chotiari Reservoir Pai Forest It can be inferred the biodiversity runs (highest first) from Keti Bunder >Pai Forest >Keenjhar Lake> Chotiari Reservoir>Shah Belo. Interestingly Chotiari Reservoir comes second to last whereas it would be expected to be on top like it does for mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Keti Bunder and Keenjhar Lake certainly have the potential to support a diverse variety of avifauna even though they are subjected to a high level of environmental degradation. Looking at similarity index it can be inferred that the index value (highest first) runs as: Keenjhar lake: Chotiari Reservoir = Keenjhar Lake: Keti Shah>Chotiari Reservoir: Shah Belo>Keti Bunder: Chotiari Reservoir=Keti Bunder: Keenjhar lake>Pai Forest: Chotiari Reservoir>Keti Bunder: Keti Shah>Keti Bunder: Pai Forest>Keenjhar Lake: Pai Forest Note: Species Similarity decreases from Keenjhar Lake: Chotiari Reservoir = Keenjhar lake: Shah Belo to Keenjhar Lake: Pai Forest The list below gives the comparison index for each comparison. Figure 34 gives a graphical outlay of the index. Similarity Index o Similarity Index Keti Bunder and Keenjhar Lake =0.62 o Similarity Index Keti Bunder and Pai Forest =0.56 o Similarity Index Keti Bunder and Chotiari Reservoir =0.62 o Similarity Index Keti Bunder and Shah Belo =0.59 o Similarity Index Keenjhar Lake and Pai Forest =0.53 o Similarity Index Keenjhar Lake and Chotiari Reservoir =0.68 o Similarity Index Keenjhar Lake and Shah Belo =0.68 o Similarity Index Pai Forest and Chotiari Reservoir =0.60 o Similarity Index Pai Forest and Shah Belo =0.54 o Similarity Index Chotiari Reservoir and Shah Belo =0.64 Figure 34 – Similarity Index for birds recorded during summer across all sites
Index value Detailed Ecological Assessment Report 2008 – Keenjhar Lake 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.62 0.56 0.62 0.59 0.53 Keti Bunder and Pai Forest Keti Bunder and Keenjhar Lake Site comparison Keti Bunder and Keti Shah Keti Bunder and Chotiari Reservoir 0.68 0.68 Keenjhar Lake and Pai Forest 0.6 0.54 Keenjhar Lake and Keti Shah Keenjhar Lake and Chotiari Reservoir WWF Pakistan – Indus for All Programme Page 144 of 188 0.64 Pai Forest and Keti Shah Pai Forest and Chotiari Reservoir Chotiari Reservoir and Keti Shah Finally coming to the biodiversity index, Table 49 shows the indexes for each site and Figure 35 gives a graphical portrayal of the same figures. Table 45 - Simpson’s Index from Keenjhar Lake in summer S.no Site name Index 1 Keti Bunder 0.957305 2 Keenjhar lake 0.940157 3 Pai Forest 0.950601 4 Chotiari Reservoir 0.918462 5 Keti Shah 0.911427 Figure 35 – Simpson’s diversity index for winter over all sites Index value 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.9 0.89 0.88 Keti Bunder Keenjhar lake Pai Forest Chotiari Reservoir Site Keti Shah
Page 2 and 3:
Disclaimer note This information sh
Page 4 and 5:
Detailed Ecological Assessment Repo
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
List of tables Detailed Ecological
Page 10 and 11:
List of figures Detailed Ecological
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
42 Leiognathus splendens Leiognathi
Page 90 and 91:
64 Rastrelliger kanagurta Scombrida
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Mukhtar, 1988 14 Narejo, 1996 Detai
Page 114 and 115: Detailed Ecological Assessment Repo
Page 154 and 155: S. No. Detailed Ecological Assessme
Page 168 and 169: Index value 0.96 0.94 0.92 Detailed
Page 170 and 171: Comparison value 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.
show all

Disclaimer note - WWF - Pakistan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?