View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
..<br />
(i) Societal abuse<br />
[68]<br />
According to Gil (1971) much has been written on the role <strong>of</strong> the individual, familial,<br />
social, economic and cultural precipitators <strong>of</strong> abuse. Much has been written on the<br />
role played by societies in condoning and perpetuating the widespread abuse <strong>of</strong><br />
children through tacit acceptance <strong>of</strong>poverty, malnutrition, hunger, infant mortality and<br />
preventable diseases. Children, especially poor children, have suffered the devastating<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> social abuse for centuries, such as their exploitation through prostitution,<br />
enslavement, child labour in factories, workhouses and chaingangs. Children have<br />
been, still are, and will be abused in the home, in the school, in the workplace,<br />
institutions, and child "care" facilities. The latter part <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century has seen<br />
an increase in family violence, and a decrease in societally sanctioned abuse, or so it<br />
appears. Gil (1971) states that the hysterical public reaction to individual cases <strong>of</strong><br />
abuse is merely a means <strong>of</strong>"scapegoating", whereby society divests itself <strong>of</strong> any blame,<br />
and lays it at the door <strong>of</strong> individual families.<br />
Lally (1984 : 249) discusses the role <strong>of</strong> economic and technological institutions as the<br />
perpetrators <strong>of</strong>societal abuse. Inflation, recession and unemployment, undermine the<br />
individuals ability to care for his family, leaving him with a feeling <strong>of</strong> worthlessness.<br />
Downward economic trends hit the poor the hardest. Social systems delegate most<br />
people to inferior positions and expect them to compete successfully for the<br />
ever-dirninishing rewards <strong>of</strong> success.<br />
The influence <strong>of</strong> technology is felt even before the baby lets out his first cry. Medical<br />
technology decides where the baby will be born, how and when, and as Lally (1984 :<br />
249) says, they "fit nicely into time-and-efficiency-conscious plan<strong>of</strong>labour." The advent<br />
<strong>of</strong> technology has made everything impersonal, objectified and given a price. Even<br />
children are viewed in terms <strong>of</strong> the pay-<strong>of</strong>f they can bring us. Those who do not<br />
comply suffer the consequences.<br />
Gil (1975 : 350) states that the basic values and philosophies <strong>of</strong> a society will<br />
determine whether all individuals in that society will be able to develop fully and