02.08.2013 Views

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 27 summarizes statistically significant findings f<strong>or</strong> teacher compliance with<br />

intervention methods. Mean sc<strong>or</strong>es f<strong>or</strong> the book reading log item emerged as significant<br />

predict<strong>or</strong>s <strong>of</strong> children‘s post-intervention TOPEL Definitional Vocabulary sc<strong>or</strong>es,<br />

suggesting that teachers‘ emotional discussion skills influenced children‘s vocabulary<br />

skills regardless <strong>of</strong> experimental group assignment and pre-intervention sc<strong>or</strong>es. The<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> children‘s st<strong>or</strong>ybook reading participation significantly predicted only<br />

children‘s post-intervention AKT affective perspective taking sc<strong>or</strong>es, indicating that mere<br />

frequency to emotion-laden discussion influenced children‘s emotion knowledge. Finally,<br />

mean length <strong>of</strong> audiotaped st<strong>or</strong>ybook readings, regardless <strong>of</strong> experimental group<br />

assignment and pre-intervention sc<strong>or</strong>es, and also assignment to the book reading control<br />

group negatively predicted post-intervention MPAC Productive aggregate sc<strong>or</strong>es,<br />

indicating that sh<strong>or</strong>ter st<strong>or</strong>ybook readings and participation in the intervention group lead<br />

to children‘s showing greater productiveness in the classroom context.<br />

Teacher Attitudes Toward Intervention Implementation<br />

To assess teacher attitudes toward the implementation <strong>of</strong> the intervention, a total<br />

<strong>of</strong> six variables were computed. Five variables represented each TASEL subscale (i.e.,<br />

Program Effectiveness, Competence, Time Constraints, Training, and Administrative<br />

Supp<strong>or</strong>t), and the sixth variable represented a composite <strong>of</strong> all five TASEL subscales.<br />

Table 28 includes descriptive statistics f<strong>or</strong> the TASEL subscale and aggregate<br />

sc<strong>or</strong>es. Mean sc<strong>or</strong>es f<strong>or</strong> the Program Effectiveness (M = 22.56), Competence (M =<br />

22.63), Training (M = 22.15, possible sc<strong>or</strong>e ranges = 4-24), and Administrative Supp<strong>or</strong>t<br />

subscales (M = 28.81, possible sc<strong>or</strong>e range = 5-30) were near the high end <strong>of</strong> possible<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!