Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal
Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal
Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 27 summarizes statistically significant findings f<strong>or</strong> teacher compliance with<br />
intervention methods. Mean sc<strong>or</strong>es f<strong>or</strong> the book reading log item emerged as significant<br />
predict<strong>or</strong>s <strong>of</strong> children‘s post-intervention TOPEL Definitional Vocabulary sc<strong>or</strong>es,<br />
suggesting that teachers‘ emotional discussion skills influenced children‘s vocabulary<br />
skills regardless <strong>of</strong> experimental group assignment and pre-intervention sc<strong>or</strong>es. The<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> children‘s st<strong>or</strong>ybook reading participation significantly predicted only<br />
children‘s post-intervention AKT affective perspective taking sc<strong>or</strong>es, indicating that mere<br />
frequency to emotion-laden discussion influenced children‘s emotion knowledge. Finally,<br />
mean length <strong>of</strong> audiotaped st<strong>or</strong>ybook readings, regardless <strong>of</strong> experimental group<br />
assignment and pre-intervention sc<strong>or</strong>es, and also assignment to the book reading control<br />
group negatively predicted post-intervention MPAC Productive aggregate sc<strong>or</strong>es,<br />
indicating that sh<strong>or</strong>ter st<strong>or</strong>ybook readings and participation in the intervention group lead<br />
to children‘s showing greater productiveness in the classroom context.<br />
Teacher Attitudes Toward Intervention Implementation<br />
To assess teacher attitudes toward the implementation <strong>of</strong> the intervention, a total<br />
<strong>of</strong> six variables were computed. Five variables represented each TASEL subscale (i.e.,<br />
Program Effectiveness, Competence, Time Constraints, Training, and Administrative<br />
Supp<strong>or</strong>t), and the sixth variable represented a composite <strong>of</strong> all five TASEL subscales.<br />
Table 28 includes descriptive statistics f<strong>or</strong> the TASEL subscale and aggregate<br />
sc<strong>or</strong>es. Mean sc<strong>or</strong>es f<strong>or</strong> the Program Effectiveness (M = 22.56), Competence (M =<br />
22.63), Training (M = 22.15, possible sc<strong>or</strong>e ranges = 4-24), and Administrative Supp<strong>or</strong>t<br />
subscales (M = 28.81, possible sc<strong>or</strong>e range = 5-30) were near the high end <strong>of</strong> possible<br />
106