Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal
Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal
Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
assigned to the intervention and book reading control groups, a MANCOVA included<br />
classroom and experimental group assignment as the independent variables, children‘s<br />
Head Start attendance rates during the implementation <strong>of</strong> the intervention as the<br />
covariate, and post-intervention AKT affective labeling and affective perspective taking<br />
sc<strong>or</strong>es as the dependent variables.<br />
Results f<strong>or</strong> emotion knowledge are presented in Table 34. Results f<strong>or</strong> AKT<br />
affective labeling sc<strong>or</strong>es revealed no statistically significant differences f<strong>or</strong> the interaction<br />
<strong>of</strong> classroom and experimental group assignment (F (1, 109) = 0.00, ns), n<strong>or</strong> f<strong>or</strong> the main<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> classroom assignment (F (1, 109) = 0.01, ns) <strong>or</strong> experimental group assignment<br />
(F (1, 109) = 1.02, ns).<br />
Results f<strong>or</strong> AKT affective perspective taking sc<strong>or</strong>es revealed a statistically<br />
significant interaction <strong>of</strong> classroom and experimental group assignment (F (1, 109) =<br />
5.35, η 2 = .05, p < .05) after partialing the effects <strong>of</strong> Head Start attendance rates during<br />
the implementation <strong>of</strong> the intervention. An interaction plot was generated in <strong>or</strong>der to<br />
examine group differences in post-intervention AKT affective perspective taking sc<strong>or</strong>es.<br />
The plot (see Appendix P) indicated that post-intervention AKT affective perspective<br />
taking sc<strong>or</strong>es were higher f<strong>or</strong> children in half-day classrooms assigned to the intervention<br />
group (M = 39.13) when compared to children in full-day classrooms assigned to the<br />
intervention group (M = 35.87). The plot also illustrated similar affective perspective<br />
taking skills <strong>of</strong> children in half- (M = 38.31) and full-day (37.53) classrooms assigned to<br />
the book reading control group.<br />
114