Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal
Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal
Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
variables. An effect code f<strong>or</strong> classroom assignment (full- <strong>or</strong> half-day classroom) and<br />
children‘s total Head Start attendance during intervention implementation were added to<br />
regression analyses, and children‘s pre-intervention TOPEL, AKT, and MPAC sc<strong>or</strong>es<br />
were added to ANCOVA and MANCOVA analyses. Results revealed only min<strong>or</strong><br />
revisions to findings rep<strong>or</strong>ted in this study; thus, these new analyses were not rep<strong>or</strong>ted.<br />
Rather than including different control variables, these opposing findings were<br />
likely due to a fundamental difference between ANOVA- and regression-based analytic<br />
approaches: Whereas ANOVA-based analyses ign<strong>or</strong>ed the magnitude <strong>of</strong> differences<br />
among the categ<strong>or</strong>ical independent variables classroom and experimental group<br />
assignment, regression-based analyses utilized the magnitude <strong>of</strong> experimental group<br />
assignment (see Kirk, 1995). In the hierarchical regression analyses included in this<br />
study, effect codes reflecting experimental group assignment were included as<br />
independent variables, thus allowing an examination <strong>of</strong> each experimental group mean to<br />
the mean <strong>of</strong> the total sample (Cohen et al., 2003).<br />
Like previous research, these findings supp<strong>or</strong>t the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> dialogic<br />
reading techniques in enhancing children‘s emergent literacy skills. Variations <strong>of</strong> dialogic<br />
reading methodologies used in previous research have been shown effective when<br />
implemented within a number <strong>of</strong> contexts (e.g., children‘s homes and preschool<br />
classrooms, Lonigan & Whitehurst, 1998), within varied time frames (e.g., 1 month,<br />
Whitehurst et al., 1988; 7 months, Whitehurst et al., 1994, 1999), and within low-income<br />
(Lonigan & Whitehurst, 1998; Whitehurst et al., 1994, 1999) and language-delayed<br />
children (Crain-Th<strong>or</strong>eson & Dale, 1999). Collectively, these findings supp<strong>or</strong>t the use <strong>of</strong><br />
126