05.08.2013 Views

Gasoline Price Changes - Federal Trade Commission

Gasoline Price Changes - Federal Trade Commission

Gasoline Price Changes - Federal Trade Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GASOLINE PRICE CHANGES:<br />

51. Pub. L. No. 91-604, 84 Stat. 1698.<br />

52. Pub. L. No. 101-549, 104 Stat. 2468.<br />

53. Pub. L. No. 102-486, 106 Stat. 2776.<br />

54. See discussion infra Chapter 4(II).<br />

55. Larson 5/8 at 79-80. See also id. at 73 (“The emissions impact of RFG . . . is estimated to be equivalent to<br />

removing about 16 million passenger vehicles from our roads.”).<br />

56. Larson 5/8 at 74.<br />

57. See EIA, 1995 Reformulated <strong>Gasoline</strong> Market Affected Refiners Differently, in DOE/EIA-0380(1996/01),<br />

PETROLEUM MARKETING MONTHLY (1996), and studies cited therein.<br />

58. <strong>Gasoline</strong> blendstocks (such as alkylates, reformate, or RBOB) are unfinished gasoline components that will be<br />

blended with other components to produce finished gasoline that can be used by consumers.<br />

59. PETROLEUM MERGER REPORT, supra note 28, at 61.<br />

60. Data are from EIA, Complete History XLS, in THIS WEEK IN PETROLEUM: CRUDE OIL, at<br />

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/twip/twip_crude.html (last modified June 8, 2005).<br />

61. Data are from Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Expenditure Survey, at http://www.bls.gov/data/home.htm<br />

(last visited June 12, 2005).<br />

62. EIA, DOE/EIA-0206(03), PERFORMANCE PROFILES OF MAJOR ENERGY PRODUCERS 2003, at 68-69 (2005), at<br />

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/perfpro/perfpro2003.pdf. Capital employed is total assets minus current liabilities,<br />

while return on capital employed is operating income divided by capital employed.<br />

63. Id.<br />

64. The six firms are Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Sunoco, Tesoro, and Valero.<br />

65. As noted in Chapter 2(III), supra, private oil companies have relatively small shares of world crude oil<br />

production, which limits their individual influence on crude oil prices.<br />

66. Some of the increase in net income for refining and marketing is due to stronger demand. Nonetheless, other<br />

factors may also be important. For example, some of the increase in refining and marketing net income is due to<br />

investments to increase the ability to process lower-quality crude oil. The price difference between sweet and sour,<br />

as well as between light and heavy, crude oil widened in 2004. For example, according to Valero’s 2004 10-K<br />

filing:<br />

66<br />

Since approximately 50% of Valero’s total throughput represents sour crude oil feedstocks,<br />

Valero’s profitability is also significantly affected by the spread between sweet crude oil and sour<br />

crude oil prices, referred to as the “sour crude oil discount.” For the year 2004, both refined<br />

product margins and sour crude oil discounts were the best ever experienced by Valero. The<br />

strength of those positive industry fundamentals significantly enhanced Valero’s results of<br />

operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 . . . . Valero’s operating results during 2004<br />

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, JUNE 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!