10.08.2013 Views

Soins maternels intensifs (Maternal Intensive Care) en Belgique - KCE

Soins maternels intensifs (Maternal Intensive Care) en Belgique - KCE

Soins maternels intensifs (Maternal Intensive Care) en Belgique - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 94 <strong>Maternal</strong> <strong>Int<strong>en</strong>sive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> in Belgium 23<br />

3.2.3 Results<br />

A. Main causes of maternal death<br />

These can be divided into obstetrical and non obstetrical (cf. supra). Only the 1 st<br />

category will be considered, as the other conditions are less likely to be admitted to<br />

int<strong>en</strong>sive care or high dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy units.<br />

The following are the leading causes and preval<strong>en</strong>ce (per million) of maternal death over<br />

the last published nine years.<br />

• Direct causes<br />

o Thrombosis and thromboembolism 16.0<br />

o Hypert<strong>en</strong>sive disease of pregnancy 7.5<br />

o Haemorrhage 7.5<br />

o Amniotic fluid embolism 3.8<br />

o Early Pregnancy 7.2<br />

o Sepsis 6.6<br />

o Uterine trauma 3.7<br />

o Anaesthesia 2.6<br />

• Indirect causes<br />

o Cardiac indirect 15.0<br />

o Psychiatric indirect 20.0<br />

o Cancer indirect 4.2<br />

o Other indirect 36.0<br />

In effect many of these conditions are very dramatic, and it would be unusual for the<br />

pati<strong>en</strong>t to be admitted for a long duration stay prior to the developm<strong>en</strong>t of the<br />

condition in most cases. The most notable exceptions to this assumption are probably<br />

the indirect cardiac and psychiatric deaths, but it can be hypothesised that such cases<br />

would mostly not be admitted to a MIC.<br />

We consequ<strong>en</strong>tly conclude that the examination of maternal deaths gives good<br />

information about the causes of deaths, but does not contribute much to decisions<br />

regarding the needs for maternal int<strong>en</strong>sive and high dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy care.<br />

We therefore proceeded to analyse published reports of maternal morbidity,<br />

attempting to restrict the review to severe morbidity. This was done in three steps:1)<br />

analysis of the wording in use to distinguish severe from non severe morbidity and<br />

conceptualisation of indicators; 2) review of published data in relation to hospitalisation<br />

or to population based reporting, and 3) finally, for certain conditions specific papers on<br />

the topic have be<strong>en</strong> included.<br />

B. Conceptualisation of severe morbidity and wording in use<br />

This section is largely inspired by the work which has be<strong>en</strong> done within the PERISTAT<br />

European Union group working group on maternal morbidity. Much of the primary<br />

work related to disease, managem<strong>en</strong>t or organ classification was due to Geller and<br />

associates, 3 2 and is in effect an ext<strong>en</strong>sion to maternal and child health of concepts<br />

already used in adult int<strong>en</strong>sive care. Four concepts will be addressed: disease based<br />

definitions, managem<strong>en</strong>t based definitions, organ failure based definitions and combined<br />

approach definitions.<br />

C. Disease-based definitions of maternal morbidity<br />

A common approach among studies is to use definitions based on disease-specific<br />

morbidities.<br />

Examples of these can be found in the MOMS-B EU study, which used common<br />

definitions for giv<strong>en</strong> conditions (severe preeclampsia, sepsis and haemorrhage which<br />

were th<strong>en</strong> prospectively collected during a 12 month in 11 regions of Europe 19 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!