Soins maternels intensifs (Maternal Intensive Care) en Belgique - KCE
Soins maternels intensifs (Maternal Intensive Care) en Belgique - KCE
Soins maternels intensifs (Maternal Intensive Care) en Belgique - KCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 94 <strong>Maternal</strong> <strong>Int<strong>en</strong>sive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> in Belgium 23<br />
3.2.3 Results<br />
A. Main causes of maternal death<br />
These can be divided into obstetrical and non obstetrical (cf. supra). Only the 1 st<br />
category will be considered, as the other conditions are less likely to be admitted to<br />
int<strong>en</strong>sive care or high dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy units.<br />
The following are the leading causes and preval<strong>en</strong>ce (per million) of maternal death over<br />
the last published nine years.<br />
• Direct causes<br />
o Thrombosis and thromboembolism 16.0<br />
o Hypert<strong>en</strong>sive disease of pregnancy 7.5<br />
o Haemorrhage 7.5<br />
o Amniotic fluid embolism 3.8<br />
o Early Pregnancy 7.2<br />
o Sepsis 6.6<br />
o Uterine trauma 3.7<br />
o Anaesthesia 2.6<br />
• Indirect causes<br />
o Cardiac indirect 15.0<br />
o Psychiatric indirect 20.0<br />
o Cancer indirect 4.2<br />
o Other indirect 36.0<br />
In effect many of these conditions are very dramatic, and it would be unusual for the<br />
pati<strong>en</strong>t to be admitted for a long duration stay prior to the developm<strong>en</strong>t of the<br />
condition in most cases. The most notable exceptions to this assumption are probably<br />
the indirect cardiac and psychiatric deaths, but it can be hypothesised that such cases<br />
would mostly not be admitted to a MIC.<br />
We consequ<strong>en</strong>tly conclude that the examination of maternal deaths gives good<br />
information about the causes of deaths, but does not contribute much to decisions<br />
regarding the needs for maternal int<strong>en</strong>sive and high dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy care.<br />
We therefore proceeded to analyse published reports of maternal morbidity,<br />
attempting to restrict the review to severe morbidity. This was done in three steps:1)<br />
analysis of the wording in use to distinguish severe from non severe morbidity and<br />
conceptualisation of indicators; 2) review of published data in relation to hospitalisation<br />
or to population based reporting, and 3) finally, for certain conditions specific papers on<br />
the topic have be<strong>en</strong> included.<br />
B. Conceptualisation of severe morbidity and wording in use<br />
This section is largely inspired by the work which has be<strong>en</strong> done within the PERISTAT<br />
European Union group working group on maternal morbidity. Much of the primary<br />
work related to disease, managem<strong>en</strong>t or organ classification was due to Geller and<br />
associates, 3 2 and is in effect an ext<strong>en</strong>sion to maternal and child health of concepts<br />
already used in adult int<strong>en</strong>sive care. Four concepts will be addressed: disease based<br />
definitions, managem<strong>en</strong>t based definitions, organ failure based definitions and combined<br />
approach definitions.<br />
C. Disease-based definitions of maternal morbidity<br />
A common approach among studies is to use definitions based on disease-specific<br />
morbidities.<br />
Examples of these can be found in the MOMS-B EU study, which used common<br />
definitions for giv<strong>en</strong> conditions (severe preeclampsia, sepsis and haemorrhage which<br />
were th<strong>en</strong> prospectively collected during a 12 month in 11 regions of Europe 19 .