10.08.2013 Views

Soins maternels intensifs (Maternal Intensive Care) en Belgique - KCE

Soins maternels intensifs (Maternal Intensive Care) en Belgique - KCE

Soins maternels intensifs (Maternal Intensive Care) en Belgique - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58 <strong>Maternal</strong> <strong>Int<strong>en</strong>sive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> in Belgium <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 94<br />

Gestational age<br />

DISTRIBUTION OF GESTATIONAL AGE<br />

Table 25: Distribution of gestational age according to type of maternity<br />

Maternities<br />

without MICservices<br />

Maternities<br />

with MIC-services All<br />

22-28 : Extreme prematurity<br />

136 0.2% 427 1.5% 563 0.6%<br />

29-32 : Very preterm 316 0.4% 679 2.5% 995 1.0%<br />

33-36 : Preterm delivery 4,430 6.3% 2,128 7.7% 6,558 6.7%<br />

37-42 : Term delivery 65,716 93.1% 24,383 88.3% 90,099 91.7%<br />

>=42 : Prolonged pregnancy 5 0.0% 4 0.0% 9 0.0%<br />

Missing information 9 7 16<br />

All 70,612 100.0% 27,628 100.0% 98,240 100.0%<br />

Source: Merged IMA and MKG/RCM Data 01/10/2003 – 30/09/2004<br />

Birth weight<br />

The maternities with a MIC-service deliver more wom<strong>en</strong> with premature neonates than<br />

the others (1.5% versus 0.2% for the extremely premature; 2.5% versus 0.4% for the<br />

very preterm; 7.7% versus 6.3% for the premature). The differ<strong>en</strong>ce is statically<br />

significant; χ² test, p value < 0.0001.<br />

24.5% of the extremely preterm babies and 31.8 % of the very preterm were<br />

born in a maternity without a MIC-service.<br />

DISTRIBUTION OF BIRTH WEIGHT<br />

Table 26: Distribution of birth weight according to type of maternity<br />

Maternities<br />

without MIC-services<br />

Maternities<br />

with MIC-services All<br />

500 - 999 : Extreme low birth weight 103 0.1% 341 1.2% 444 0.5%<br />

1000 - 1499 : Very low birth weight 188 0.3% 442 1.6% 630 0.6%<br />

1500 - 2499 : Low birth weight 3,940 5.6% 2,164 7.8% 6,104 6.2%<br />

2500 - 3999 : Normal birth weight 60,920 86.3% 22,828 82.6% 83,748 85.2%<br />

>=4000 : High birth weight 5,430 7.7% 1,805 6.5% 7,235 7.4%<br />

Missing information 31 48 79<br />

All 70,612 100.0% 27,628 100.0% 98,240 100.0%<br />

Source: Merged IMA and MKG/RCM Data 01/10/2003 – 30/09/2004<br />

The birth weight is tightly linked to the term of the newborn.<br />

The proportion of neonates with extremely low birth weight (ELBW) (1.2% versus<br />

0.1%), of very low birth weight (VLBW)(1.6% versus 0.3%) and of low birth weight<br />

(7.8% versus 5.6%) is higher in the maternities with MIC-service than in the others. The<br />

differ<strong>en</strong>ce is statistically significant; χ² test, p value < 0.0001.<br />

Overall 23.2% of the neonates with ELBW, 29.8% of the VLBW and 64.5% of<br />

the LBW (Low Birth Weight) were born in maternities without MIC-service.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!