22.08.2013 Views

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 6 – Fluid uptake as instructive factor<br />

were used. Every day the pH of the degrading solution was recorded with a pH–meter<br />

(Orion 4 Star, Thermo Scientific, USA) and the medium was refreshed in case the pH<br />

fell below 7. With the solution removed at every refreshment, the amounts (in mg) of<br />

calcium and phosphate ions released from the samples were measured using<br />

appropriate biochemical kits (QuantiChrom TM Calcium assay kit, BioAssay Systems,<br />

USA; PhosphoWorks TM Colorimetric Phosphate Assay kit Blue Color, Bioquest Inc,<br />

USA) with the help of a spectrophotometer (AnthosZenyth 3100, Anthos Labtec<br />

Instruments GmbH, Salzburg, Austria) and absorbance filter of 620 nm for both<br />

assays. At each of the considered time points, i.e. 1, 3 and 5 weeks, the granules<br />

were removed from the degrading media, the excess PBS was wiped away and their<br />

wet weight was measured (mwet). Afterwards they have been vacuum–dried at room<br />

temperature until their weight was stable and then were weighed (mdry). The mass<br />

loss and fluid uptake of the composites was determined as:<br />

mass loss = 100 · (m0 – mdry) / m0<br />

fluid uptake = 100 · (mwet – mdry) / mdry<br />

Part of the degraded samples were then heated at 900°C to burn the polymer phase<br />

out and determine the final effective apatite and polymer contents. The remaining part<br />

of the samples was dissolved in chloroform (Sigma–Aldrich) and, after separating<br />

apatite from the polymer, we determined the inherent and intrinsic viscosities (inh and<br />

) and weight average molecular weight (Mw) using an Ubbelohde viscometer as<br />

explained in §6.2.3. To evaluate the hydrolysis rate of the polymer phase in the two<br />

composites we estimated the autocatalysed hydrolytic degradation rate constant<br />

k as (see §6.2.5.1. for theory background):<br />

k · t = –ln( / )<br />

where is the initial intrinsic viscosity and is the intrinsic viscosity at the<br />

considered time point t (t=0, 7, 21 and 35 days) for the considered polymer phase.<br />

The results were plotted on a graph ln(/) against time t (in days) and the<br />

constant k was estimated with linear regression.<br />

6.2.6. Surface mineralization in simulated body fluid<br />

Simulated body fluid (SBF) was prepared according to Kokubo [247] by dissolving<br />

reagent grade chemicals (Merck) in distilled water strictly in the following order: NaCl,<br />

NaHCO3, KCl, K2HPO4·3H20, MgCl2·6H2O, CaCl2 (calcium ion standard solution 0.1<br />

M, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland) and Na2SO4. The fluid was then buffered to pH 7.4<br />

at 36.5°C using Tris ((CH2OH)3CNH3) and 1 M HCl. The final solution had an ion<br />

concentration (in mM) as follows: Na + , 142; K + , 5; Mg 2+ , 1.5; Ca 2+ , 2.5; Cl – , 147.8;<br />

(HCO3) – , 4.2; (HPO4) 2– , 1; (SO4) 2– , 0.5. Granules of the composites (0.25 g) and<br />

ceramics (0.25 g, prepared by crushing and sieving the cylinders) were soaked in 100<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!