22.08.2013 Views

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 – Instructive composites: effect of filler content on osteoinduction<br />

mineralization generates a suitable environment for inducible cells to form bone [217] and<br />

allows osteoinduction occur. [248, 249]<br />

Besides in vivo surface mineralization, protein adsorption may also play a role in<br />

triggering ectopic bone formation. It has been reported that a bioinert Al2O3 ceramic<br />

adsorbs proteins and induces bone formation in muscle of dogs while it was not shown<br />

to surface calcify in vitro or in vivo. [251] It has also been shown that calcium phosphate<br />

materials have high affinity for proteins (e.g. bone morphogenetic proteins, BMPs) [228, 249,<br />

326] and that composites with high content of HA adsorb more proteins. [242] Based on<br />

these assumptions, it may well be that 40% CaP composites could have adsorbed<br />

higher amount of proteins (including BMPs) from the surrounding body fluids. Such<br />

proteins may have then contributed to instruct (stem) cells to osteogenically differentiate<br />

and trigger inductive bone formation. Conversely, composites with lower apatite content<br />

would not adsorb enough proteins to start osteoinduction. However, the proteins that are<br />

adsorbed and play a potential role in 40% CaP osteoinduction need to be evaluated in<br />

further studies.<br />

Another aspect regarding inductive bone formation in 40% CaP may be ion release<br />

(especially calcium) from the composites. Calcium is believed to be an extra–cellular<br />

signaling molecule in bone [321–323] and it has been shown that ions released from calcium<br />

phosphate materials do not only enhance the bioactivity of materials [227, 228, 324] but also<br />

the proliferation, differentiation and mineralization of osteogenic cells. [321–323] We<br />

observed higher amounts of calcium ions released in vitro from 40% CaP composites<br />

compared to the others and, as shown in this study, only 40% CaP gave rise to inductive<br />

bone formation, indicating a possible role of the amount of calcium ion released in<br />

osteoinduction. The higher release of calcium ions from 40% CaP, as compared to the<br />

other three considered materials, might be due to the fact that it exposes more apatite<br />

on its surface. Moreover, at the contact with surrounding fluids, the exposed apatite may<br />

have dissolved releasing calcium. Besides this, hydrolysis of the polymer matrix could<br />

have occurred further exposing apatite from its bulk and enhancing ion release. Thus the<br />

large amount of calcium released may have triggered 40% CaP composite–related<br />

osteoinduction. [325] However, the importance that calcium ions may have in triggering<br />

heterotopic bone formation still needs to be understood and demonstrated.<br />

Finally, the surface micro–structural changes due to the increased apatite content in the<br />

four composites could have played a role as well. Several studies have reported that<br />

controlled micro– or nano–structures do not only have positive effects on the<br />

differentiation of (mesenchymal) stem cells into osteogenic cells, [195] but also influence<br />

protein adsorption and ion release. [217, 228, 326] As shown in Figure 4, the 40% CaP has a<br />

rougher surface micro–structure as compared to those composites with lower apatite<br />

contents. Previous studies have reported that specific surface micro–structure on a<br />

chemically unaltered ceramic can render osteoinductive ceramics. [217, 228, 237] Further, we<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!