Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)
Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)
Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 3 – Instructive composites: effect of filler content on osteoinduction<br />
years into non–toxic components that can be cleared from the body. Polylactide is<br />
widely used in the medical field (e.g. screws, sutures) and as scaffold for tissue<br />
engineering and drug delivery applications. It has adequate mechanical properties for<br />
certain applications (e.g. screws and plates), but it is too elastic for load–bearing bone<br />
replacement purposes. [305] Thus, introducing calcium phosphates into polylactide was<br />
an attempt to have osteoconductive materials with suitable mechanical properties. It<br />
has been shown that adding nano–hydroxyapatite particulate or fibres into polylactide<br />
materials improves the mechanical properties of the material, [239, 240] while composites<br />
containing more than 40%wt. hydroxyapatite renders the material osteoconductive. [241]<br />
Further, the presence of hydroxyapatite particles increased protein adsorption and<br />
enhanced osteoblast adhesion. [241–243] So far, only one composite of polyester and<br />
ceramic has been reported to be osteoinductive [235] and, to our best knowledge, no<br />
literature about the effects of ceramic filler content on composite–related<br />
osteoinduction is available. In the current study we present an approach to produce<br />
instructive composites by introducing different amounts of nano–sized apatite into<br />
poly(D,L–lactic acid). We evaluated the materials both in vitro and in vivo regarding<br />
their chemistry, ion release rate, surface mineralisation and osteoinductivity and<br />
hypothesize that adding increasing amounts of nano–apatite to a polymer will<br />
generate a specific surface micro–structure that will result in an osteoinductive<br />
composite. More apatite particles exposed at the surface will allow higher ion release,<br />
protein adsorption and surface mineralization that should further enhance the bone<br />
regenerative properties. [86, 228, 237, 263]<br />
3.2. <strong>Materials</strong> and methods<br />
3.2.1. Nano–apatite synthesis and physico–chemical characterization<br />
Nano–apatite was prepared using a wet–precipitation reaction [306] where (NH4)2HPO4<br />
(Fluka, Steinheim, Germany) aqueous solution (c=63.1 g L –1 ) was added to<br />
Ca(NO3)2·4H2O (Fluka) aqueous solution (c=117.5 g L –1 ) with controlled speed (12.5<br />
mL min –1 ) at 80±5ºC. The reaction pH was kept above 10 by using ammonia (Fluka)<br />
as buffer. After precipitation, the resulting apatite powder was aged overnight,<br />
washed with distilled water to fully remove ammonia and finally suspended in acetone<br />
(Fluka) at a concentration of 0.1 g mL –1 . A small amount of the powder was then<br />
sintered at 1100°C for 200 min (Nabertherm C19, Nabertherm, Lilienthal, Germany)<br />
for chemical characterization. Both the unsintered and sintered apatite powders were<br />
analysed by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, Perkin Elmer Spectrum<br />
1000, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and X–ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku<br />
MiniFlex I, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). FTIR was run according a typical KBr pellet<br />
protocol and spectra were collected in the range 400–4000 cm –1 and analysed with<br />
50