22.08.2013 Views

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 – Instructive composites: effect of filler content on osteoinduction<br />

years into non–toxic components that can be cleared from the body. Polylactide is<br />

widely used in the medical field (e.g. screws, sutures) and as scaffold for tissue<br />

engineering and drug delivery applications. It has adequate mechanical properties for<br />

certain applications (e.g. screws and plates), but it is too elastic for load–bearing bone<br />

replacement purposes. [305] Thus, introducing calcium phosphates into polylactide was<br />

an attempt to have osteoconductive materials with suitable mechanical properties. It<br />

has been shown that adding nano–hydroxyapatite particulate or fibres into polylactide<br />

materials improves the mechanical properties of the material, [239, 240] while composites<br />

containing more than 40%wt. hydroxyapatite renders the material osteoconductive. [241]<br />

Further, the presence of hydroxyapatite particles increased protein adsorption and<br />

enhanced osteoblast adhesion. [241–243] So far, only one composite of polyester and<br />

ceramic has been reported to be osteoinductive [235] and, to our best knowledge, no<br />

literature about the effects of ceramic filler content on composite–related<br />

osteoinduction is available. In the current study we present an approach to produce<br />

instructive composites by introducing different amounts of nano–sized apatite into<br />

poly(D,L–lactic acid). We evaluated the materials both in vitro and in vivo regarding<br />

their chemistry, ion release rate, surface mineralisation and osteoinductivity and<br />

hypothesize that adding increasing amounts of nano–apatite to a polymer will<br />

generate a specific surface micro–structure that will result in an osteoinductive<br />

composite. More apatite particles exposed at the surface will allow higher ion release,<br />

protein adsorption and surface mineralization that should further enhance the bone<br />

regenerative properties. [86, 228, 237, 263]<br />

3.2. <strong>Materials</strong> and methods<br />

3.2.1. Nano–apatite synthesis and physico–chemical characterization<br />

Nano–apatite was prepared using a wet–precipitation reaction [306] where (NH4)2HPO4<br />

(Fluka, Steinheim, Germany) aqueous solution (c=63.1 g L –1 ) was added to<br />

Ca(NO3)2·4H2O (Fluka) aqueous solution (c=117.5 g L –1 ) with controlled speed (12.5<br />

mL min –1 ) at 80±5ºC. The reaction pH was kept above 10 by using ammonia (Fluka)<br />

as buffer. After precipitation, the resulting apatite powder was aged overnight,<br />

washed with distilled water to fully remove ammonia and finally suspended in acetone<br />

(Fluka) at a concentration of 0.1 g mL –1 . A small amount of the powder was then<br />

sintered at 1100°C for 200 min (Nabertherm C19, Nabertherm, Lilienthal, Germany)<br />

for chemical characterization. Both the unsintered and sintered apatite powders were<br />

analysed by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, Perkin Elmer Spectrum<br />

1000, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and X–ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku<br />

MiniFlex I, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). FTIR was run according a typical KBr pellet<br />

protocol and spectra were collected in the range 400–4000 cm –1 and analysed with<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!