22.08.2013 Views

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4 – Control of mechanical and degradation properties in composites<br />

a concentration of 0.1 g dL –1 and determined the intrinsic viscosity () using an<br />

Ubbelohde (ASTM) viscometer (0C, PSL–Rheotek, Burnham on Crouch, United<br />

Kingdom) at 25±0.1°C. The intrinsic viscosity of the polymers was calculated with the<br />

Solomon–Ciută equation [356] as follows:<br />

rel = tpol / tchlor<br />

sp = rel – 1<br />

= [sqrt(2 · (sp – ln(rel) ))] / ĉ<br />

where tpol and tchlor are the measured time for the solution of polymer and of pure<br />

chloroform to flow in the viscometer respectively, and ĉ is the polymer concentration<br />

in chloroform. The effective content by weight (%wt.) of apatite (uapatite) and polymer<br />

(upolymer) in the extruded composites was determined by burning the polymer out from<br />

the composites in a sinter oven (C19, Nabertherm, Lilienthal, Germany) at 900±5°C<br />

for two hours. We studied the surface chemistry of the composites (bars) with XRD<br />

and CR as described in §4.2.1. Cross sections of the extruded materials were<br />

observed with scanning electron microscopy (Philips XL 30 ESEM–FEG, Philips,<br />

Eindhoven, the Netherlands) in the backscattered mode (BSEM) to evaluate the<br />

distribution of apatite particles in the entire material. After making ultra–thin sections<br />

of the three materials (thickness ~50 nm) using a diamond knife (ultra AFM knife,<br />

Diatome AG, Biel, Switzerland), the distribution of apatite in the materials was<br />

observed also using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai–200FEG, FEI<br />

Europe, Eindhoven, the Netherlands). Dynamic contact angle measurements were<br />

performed to evaluate the surface hydrophilicity and drop spreading rate on the<br />

surface of the composites. At room temperature a drop of 0.6 l of distilled water was<br />

placed on the surface of the bars. Pictures were taken with a digital camera<br />

(PowerShot SX200 IS, Canon Nederland NV, Amstelveen, the Netherlands)<br />

immediately after the drop placement and then every 5 seconds for 9 minutes.<br />

Measurements of the contact angle from the pictures were done with the software<br />

ImageJ (v1.43u, NIH, USA) using the freely distributed plugin Drop–Shape Analysis<br />

working on the snake–based approach. [335]<br />

4.2.3. In vitro degradation of the composites<br />

A saline physiological solution (SPS) was prepared by dissolving sodium chloride<br />

(NaCl, Merck, c=8 g L –1 ) and 4–(2–hydroxyethyl)–1–iperazineethane–sulfonic acid<br />

(HEPES, Sigma–Aldrich, c=11.92 g L –1 ) in distilled water. The pH of the solution was<br />

adjusted to 7.3 with 2M NaOH (Merck) at 37°C. Sterile granules of each composite<br />

(0.5±0.01 g) were carefully weighed before use (m0) and soaked in 200 mL SPS (in<br />

triplicate) at 37±1°C for 3 months under a 3–week refreshing regime. Every three<br />

weeks, the pH of the degrading solution was recorded with a pH–meter (Orion 4 Star,<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!