Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)
Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)
Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 2 – The role of gels in instructive putties<br />
In the case of PVA–based putties, the gel was still present in all the explants. When<br />
comparing the in vitro and in vivo data, we could observe a possible relation between<br />
the in vitro dissolution and the in vivo clearance of the gels. It is noticeable that, as<br />
already reported in other studies, BCP granules are not expected to significantly<br />
degrade and/or resorbe in vivo over 12 weeks. [284] However it can be hypothesized<br />
that, when putties were implanted in vivo, the gels started to dissolve, probably due to<br />
the attack of water that started their hydrolysis, and were cleared away by body fluids.<br />
During their clearance, the available space between the BCP granules may have<br />
increased over time allowing soft tissues, including blood vessels, to gradually enter<br />
into the implants. This was possibly followed by colonisation of the micro–structured<br />
BCP surface by (stem) cells which finally may have been instructed to osteogenically<br />
differentiate and trigger heterotopic bone formation (Figures 3, 5). The lack of<br />
osteoinductive potential in PVA putty could be the result of preventing cells to reach<br />
the BCP surface. As already mentioned, after 12 weeks in vivo, the PVA gel was still<br />
completely present amongst BCP granules while no bone formed and cells were<br />
hardly seen in the implant. Meanwhile some residuals of CHI gel were observed and<br />
no traces of CMC and PLU gels were present. Bone and cells were abundant in CMC<br />
and PLU putties but they were less present in CHI putty. From these observations, a<br />
correlation between bone formation and gel dissolution (except ALG, as<br />
discussed here later) is likely. Although the dissolution rate and rapid clearance of the<br />
gels could be important factors controlling bone induction, other factors cannot be<br />
ruled out. For example, putties comprising the ALG gel, which had quicker dissolution<br />
rate than CMC and PLU gels, showed less bone formation. Thus, other factors must<br />
have influenced on osteoinduction, such as the chemistry of the gel or its degradation<br />
residuals. Alginate is a copolymer composed of guluronic (G) and mannuronic (M)<br />
acid blocks in different G/M content ratios that have been shown to influence the<br />
biological properties of the gels. [285–287] According to some studies, high content of G<br />
residuals provokes severe inflammation, [285, 286] while others suggested that it is<br />
caused by low G content. [287] We used native sodium alginate powder with low G<br />
content and did not observe clear signs of inflammatory reaction to ALG putties. The<br />
lower osteoinductive potential of ALG putties may be related to the biological inertia of<br />
alginate. It has been shown that native alginate does not promote significant cell<br />
adhesion [288, 289] while CMC and PLU gels were reported to support the cells adhesion<br />
and bone formation in vitro and in vivo. [290, 291] Thus, not only the dissolvability but also<br />
the chemistry of the gel and its degradation products may play a role in decreasing<br />
the osteoinductivity of some putties.<br />
36