22.08.2013 Views

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

Barbieri Thesis - BioMedical Materials program (BMM)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2 – The role of gels in instructive putties<br />

In the case of PVA–based putties, the gel was still present in all the explants. When<br />

comparing the in vitro and in vivo data, we could observe a possible relation between<br />

the in vitro dissolution and the in vivo clearance of the gels. It is noticeable that, as<br />

already reported in other studies, BCP granules are not expected to significantly<br />

degrade and/or resorbe in vivo over 12 weeks. [284] However it can be hypothesized<br />

that, when putties were implanted in vivo, the gels started to dissolve, probably due to<br />

the attack of water that started their hydrolysis, and were cleared away by body fluids.<br />

During their clearance, the available space between the BCP granules may have<br />

increased over time allowing soft tissues, including blood vessels, to gradually enter<br />

into the implants. This was possibly followed by colonisation of the micro–structured<br />

BCP surface by (stem) cells which finally may have been instructed to osteogenically<br />

differentiate and trigger heterotopic bone formation (Figures 3, 5). The lack of<br />

osteoinductive potential in PVA putty could be the result of preventing cells to reach<br />

the BCP surface. As already mentioned, after 12 weeks in vivo, the PVA gel was still<br />

completely present amongst BCP granules while no bone formed and cells were<br />

hardly seen in the implant. Meanwhile some residuals of CHI gel were observed and<br />

no traces of CMC and PLU gels were present. Bone and cells were abundant in CMC<br />

and PLU putties but they were less present in CHI putty. From these observations, a<br />

correlation between bone formation and gel dissolution (except ALG, as<br />

discussed here later) is likely. Although the dissolution rate and rapid clearance of the<br />

gels could be important factors controlling bone induction, other factors cannot be<br />

ruled out. For example, putties comprising the ALG gel, which had quicker dissolution<br />

rate than CMC and PLU gels, showed less bone formation. Thus, other factors must<br />

have influenced on osteoinduction, such as the chemistry of the gel or its degradation<br />

residuals. Alginate is a copolymer composed of guluronic (G) and mannuronic (M)<br />

acid blocks in different G/M content ratios that have been shown to influence the<br />

biological properties of the gels. [285–287] According to some studies, high content of G<br />

residuals provokes severe inflammation, [285, 286] while others suggested that it is<br />

caused by low G content. [287] We used native sodium alginate powder with low G<br />

content and did not observe clear signs of inflammatory reaction to ALG putties. The<br />

lower osteoinductive potential of ALG putties may be related to the biological inertia of<br />

alginate. It has been shown that native alginate does not promote significant cell<br />

adhesion [288, 289] while CMC and PLU gels were reported to support the cells adhesion<br />

and bone formation in vitro and in vivo. [290, 291] Thus, not only the dissolvability but also<br />

the chemistry of the gel and its degradation products may play a role in decreasing<br />

the osteoinductivity of some putties.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!