RESPONSE - Insead

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Introduction Structure of the report SMART Objective 4 (Chapter 8): Test the degree to which training techniques can develop managers’ social consciousness in order to produce socially responsible behaviour and decision making. The following figure summarises the Research Objectives of the RESPONSE project addressed via the large scale case comparative study (Part 1 of this report). Figure 1: Summary of research objectives To meet these objectives, RESPONSE carried out 427 structured interviews with executives and senior managers in 19 multinational companies and selected stakeholders in global and local organisations. These leading companies are headquartered in Europe and North America and are active in eight industries: food, pharmaceuticals, natural resources, energy, banking, chemical, information technology and industrial products. Research Objective 4 was alternatively addressed via a number of experiments conducted with 93 managers in four companies (three of which were also part of the main study) to assess the effectiveness of different training approaches in facilitating the development of social consciousness and consequently of socially responsible behaviour in managers. 1.4 Structure of the report Part I: Cognitive alignment and CSR Chapter 3: A model of cognitive alignment and social performance Chapter 4: Methodology Chapter 5: Analysis of results: managers’ understandings of CSR Chapter 6: Analysis of results: external antecedents of cognitive alignment Chapter 7: Analysis of results: internal antecedents of cognitive alignment Part II: Developing socially responsible behaviour in managers Chapter 8: A model of Socially Responsible Behaviour Chapter 9: Methodology Chapter 10: Findings Part III: Conclusions and recommendations Chapter 11: Conclusions from study findings Chapter 12: Recommendations RESPONSE: understanding and responding to societal demands on corporate responsibility 14
PART I: CSR AND COGNITIVE ALIGNMENT Structure of the report PART I: CSR AND COGNITIVE ALIGNMENT RESPONSE: understanding and responding to societal demands on corporate responsibility 15
Page 1 and 2: SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY
Page 3 and 4: Contents Executive summary 6 1 Intr
Page 5 and 6: Tables Table 1. Typology of factors
Page 7 and 8: Executive summary Recommendations c
Page 9 and 10: Executive summary Recommendations l
Page 11 and 12: Executive summary Recommendations r
Page 13: Introduction Aims of this study “
Page 17 and 18: A model of cognitive alignment and
Page 25 and 26: Methodology Scope 3 Methodology 3.1
Page 27 and 28: Methodology Company case studies Th
Page 29 and 30: Methodology Case comparison Analysi
Page 31 and 32: Methodology CrossPair Comparison
Page 33 and 34: Findings: Managers’ understanding
Page 45 and 46: Findings: External factors and cogn
Page 51 and 52: Findings: Internal factors and cogn
Page 59 and 60: A Model of Social Consciousness and
Page 65 and 66:
Methodology Experiment Settings 8.3
Page 67 and 68:
Methodology Experiment Protocols ev
Page 69 and 70:
Findings: Developing Social Conscio
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Conclusions from study findings Ass
Page 79 and 80:
Conclusions from study findings Dev
Page 81 and 82:
Conclusions from study findings Dev
Page 83 and 84:
Recommendations Recommendations for
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Recommendations: Recommendations fo
Page 107 and 108:
Recommendations: Recommendations fo
show all

RESPONSE - Insead

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?