29.08.2013 Views

RESPONSE - Insead

RESPONSE - Insead

RESPONSE - Insead

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Model of Social Consciousness and Socially Responsible Behavior Modelling Socially Responsible Behaviour<br />

stress (Van der Klint, 2001). Why is occupational stress important to the development<br />

of social consciousness in business managers? A number of reasons:<br />

a. A high level of occupational stress strengthens the prevalence of short­term<br />

orientation as a criterion for decision­making, since subjects perceive the long­<br />

term implications of their behaviour less relevant than the satisfaction of their<br />

immediate needs.<br />

b. High levels of occupational stress also reduce the breadth of search for<br />

solutions to problems and orients the search towards known territory, therefore<br />

reducing the likelihood to identify truly innovative solutions. This is particularly<br />

serious in the context of ethical dilemmas or decisional trade­offs, where the<br />

willingness to explore paths different from normal habits is crucial to the<br />

successful handling of these situations.<br />

c. Occupational stress reduces the relevance of other’s interests in one’s own<br />

decision­making priorities, since the focus is increasingly placed on the<br />

immediate satisfaction of one’s own needs. This is, in a way, the essence of<br />

the psychological disposition to behave in a socially responsible manner. If a<br />

manager does not give relevance to societal counterparts with which there is<br />

no direct interaction and/or interest, no amount of codes of conduct, corporate<br />

value statements or training programs will suffice in affecting the type of<br />

debisions and behaviours enacted. This is especially true for the pro­active<br />

type of socially responsible behaviour, aimed at “doing good” for societal<br />

counterparts, rather than simply “avoiding harm”.<br />

The combination of short­term orientation, localized search for solutions and self­interest seeking can<br />

produce a “tunnel” vision in the decision­maker, with negative implications for the likelihood of<br />

engaging in socially responsible behaviour.<br />

All together, the considerations made above appear to offer sufficient support for the hypothesis that<br />

we are interested in testing through appropriate experimental designs. In the next chapter, we<br />

describe the research experiements we conducted to test the hypothesized effect and assess its<br />

robustness vis­à­vis other training interventions.<br />

<strong>RESPONSE</strong>: understanding and responding to societal demands on corporate responsibility<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!