RESPONSE - Insead

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Valeria Berchicci, INSEAD Lourdes Casanova, INSEAD, MC member Donal Crilly, INSEAD Maria Gradillas, INSEAD Morten Hansen, INSEAD Joanne Lawrence, INSEAD Sophie Linguri, INSEAD Susan Schneider, HEC Geneva/INSEAD, MC member Pamela Sloan, HEC Montreal/INSEAD Michael Yaziji, IMD/INSEAD Peter Neergaard, coord. CBS, MC member Kai Hockerts, CBS, MC member Esben Pedersen, CBS RESPONSE RESEARCH TEAM: Maurizio Zollo, INSEAD, Academic Director, MC chair Adri Tolstrup, CBSc Katrine Goul Dueholm , CBS Hanne Poulsen, CBS Antonio Tencati, MC member Francesco Perrini, coord. Bocconi group Mario Minoja, U. Bocconi Stefano Pogutz, U. Bocconi Alessandro Zollo, U. Bocconi Wojciech Gasparski, LKA Anna LewickaStrzalecka, LKA Wolfgang Hackl, Impact Shantanu Reinhold, Impact This report is dedicated to the fond memory of: Janet Bohdanowitz, LKA Academic Advisory Board Business Advisory Board HenriClaude de Bettignies, CEIBS Peter Lacy, EABIS Tom Dunfee, U. Pennsylvania Gilbert Lenssen, EABIS Ed Freeman, U. Virginia Elena Bonfiglioli, Microsoft Bruce Kogut, INSEAD Celia Moore, IBM Eric Orts, U. Pennsylvania Brigitte TantawiMonsou, WBCSD (formerly, Unilever) Peter Pruzan, CBS Frank Welvaert, Johnson & Johnson David Vogel, U. C. Berkeley Mark Wade, (formerly) Shell Jim Walsh, U. Michigan RESPONSE: understanding and responding to societal demands on corporate responsibility
Contents Executive summary 6 1 Introduction 12 PART I: CSR AND COGNITIVE ALIGNMENT 15 2 A model of cognitive alignment and social performance 16 3 Methodology 25 4 Findings: Managers’ understandings of CSR (Objective 1) 32 5 Findings: External factors and cognitive alignment (Objective 2) 45 6 Findings: Internal factors and cognitive alignment (Objective 3) 51 PART II: SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOUR 58 7 A Model of Social Consciousness and Socially Responsible Behavior 59 8 Methodology 64 9 Findings: Developing Social Consciousness and SRB in Managers (Objective 4) 69 PART III: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 76 10 Conclusions from study findings 77 11 Recommendations 82 RESPONSE: understanding and responding to societal demands on corporate responsibility
Page 1: SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY
Page 5 and 6: Tables Table 1. Typology of factors
Page 7 and 8: Executive summary Recommendations c
Page 9 and 10: Executive summary Recommendations l
Page 11 and 12: Executive summary Recommendations r
Page 13 and 14: Introduction Aims of this study “
Page 15 and 16: PART I: CSR AND COGNITIVE ALIGNMENT
Page 17 and 18: A model of cognitive alignment and
Page 25 and 26: Methodology Scope 3 Methodology 3.1
Page 27 and 28: Methodology Company case studies Th
Page 29 and 30: Methodology Case comparison Analysi
Page 31 and 32: Methodology CrossPair Comparison
Page 33 and 34: Findings: Managers’ understanding
Page 45 and 46: Findings: External factors and cogn
Page 51 and 52: Findings: Internal factors and cogn
Page 53 and 54:
Findings: Internal factors and cogn
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
A Model of Social Consciousness and
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Methodology Experiment Settings 8.3
Page 67 and 68:
Methodology Experiment Protocols ev
Page 69 and 70:
Findings: Developing Social Conscio
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Conclusions from study findings Ass
Page 79 and 80:
Conclusions from study findings Dev
Page 81 and 82:
Conclusions from study findings Dev
Page 83 and 84:
Recommendations Recommendations for
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Recommendations: Recommendations fo
Page 107 and 108:
Recommendations: Recommendations fo
show all

RESPONSE - Insead

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?