29.08.2013 Views

RESPONSE - Insead

RESPONSE - Insead

RESPONSE - Insead

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Findings: Developing Social Consciousness and SRB in Managers (Objective 4) Controlling for “Placebo”<br />

effects: comparing meditation vs. hatha yoga training<br />

Given this surprising result, the comparison of the two types of training intervention on the basis of<br />

their impact on antecedents to SRB (motives, emotions, values, etc.) looses most of its meaning.<br />

This would only matter in the case that we expected would be easily verified, that the two<br />

interventions had a similarly positive impact on socially responsible behaviour, at least as measured<br />

by the variations in the responses to the four adopted scenarios. Since that is not the case, a formal<br />

comparison on the basis of the impacts that the two training approaches produce on the managers’<br />

psychological traits seems a bit void of practical relevance.<br />

The indication coming from the data analyzed is that (a) further probing of the actual impact of<br />

executive education on the development of socially responsible behaviour is necessary and urgent,<br />

and (b) different approaches to the problem of developing social consciousness in practicing<br />

managers need to be explored and comparatively assessed in their behavioural and psychological<br />

implications. Please, see sections 10.3 and 11.3 for further elaborations and recommendations drawn<br />

from this set of results.<br />

9.5 Controlling for “Placebo” effects: comparing meditation vs. hatha yoga training<br />

The last step in the analysis protocol of the data aims to control the robustness of the results<br />

described in section 9.3 to the so­called “placebo” effect. This is an important issue in the conduct of<br />

experimental designs in social science, since the participants to the interventions are conscious of the<br />

fact that they are being observed and that there are expectations about certain type of effects to occur<br />

as a consequence of the intervention (a training program, in our case). The way this is normally done<br />

in natural science is to provide the “sugar pill” together with the “real” pill and test whether the latter<br />

has an effect over and above that produced by the “sugar pill”.<br />

In the “oil company” experiment, we attempted for the first time to execute an experimental design of<br />

this kind. Our initial assumption is that a “Hatha Yoga” training program could represent an adequate<br />

“placebo” to the meditation­based coaching, since it has a similar name to the mediation technique<br />

used (Sahaja Yoga) and is likely to be perceived similarly to the “real” intervention. At the same time,<br />

though, the expectation was that the Hatha Yoga training, since it is based only on postures and<br />

relaxation exercises rather than deeper introspection and meditation practices, would not produce<br />

deeper changes in emotional traits, personal values and decision­making patterns that we intend to<br />

study.<br />

The evidence emerging from the data is a little different 25 . Most of the effects described in Section 9.3<br />

are still valid and maintain statistical significance even with a much smaller sample (11 managers<br />

participating in the meditation program vs. 10 managers in the hatha yoga program) 26 and in terms of<br />

difference vis­à­vis the pre­post variation of the hatha­yoga training. This is the case, for example, for<br />

the results related to the impact on emotional traits, such as lower sadness (92% confidence level),<br />

higher happiness (99.4%), stronger inspiration (98%) and courage (93%). Interestingly, an empathy<br />

test also results in a stronger impact of the meditation training compared on the hatha yoga training.<br />

In terms of (cognitive) decision­making processes, the data shows that managers who went through<br />

the meditation program report a significantly larger improvement (99.5%) in the extent to which they<br />

“make decisions easily”, compared to the same pre­post variation in the hatha yoga group. Also, the<br />

reliance on “ethics vs. economic profit” (91%), as well as on “protecting the environment vs.<br />

productivity” (85%) increases to a larger extent in the yoga meditation group.<br />

In terms of shifts in personal values, the importance of “mature love” as a guiding principle increases<br />

in a significant way (90%) in the meditation group, compared to the same variation in the hatha yoga<br />

group.<br />

25 It is worth noting that the Hatha Yoga training intervention does pass the test of having a positive<br />

impact on SRB. The pre­post variation for the Hatha Yoga group is negative with respect to “Do no<br />

harm” behaviour (especially strong in the process one, related to the outsourcing decision), and<br />

positive on the “do good” decision scenarios (although not as strong as the meditation training group).<br />

26 We again replicated the analysis with non­parametric tests (Mann­Whitney) that is here required<br />

due to small sample size. The confidence levels reported are those related to non­parametric tests.<br />

<strong>RESPONSE</strong>: understanding and responding to societal demands on corporate responsibility<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!