20.09.2013 Views

Biblical commentary on the New Testament - The Christian ...

Biblical commentary on the New Testament - The Christian ...

Biblical commentary on the New Testament - The Christian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CXXX<br />

CONCLUSION.<br />

very evident that no writings could be Divine whicli originated in<br />

deceit and imposture.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> first pkcc, we find in <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> citati<strong>on</strong>s from<br />

almost all <strong>the</strong> writings in <strong>the</strong> Old <strong>Testament</strong>.* <strong>The</strong> principal books,<br />

as, e. J/., <strong>the</strong> Pentateuch, <strong>the</strong> Psalms, <strong>the</strong> Prophet Isaiah, are cited<br />

very often, and even those less important are referred to here and<br />

<strong>the</strong>re in <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong>. A very few are entirely neglected ;'<br />

of tliis number, in particular, is Solom<strong>on</strong>'s S<strong>on</strong>g, which is nowhere<br />

cited in all <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong>. This circumstance is certainly not<br />

accidental. Perhaps it is not too much to c<strong>on</strong>clude, that <strong>the</strong> books<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Old <strong>Testament</strong> which are not at all menti<strong>on</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong>,<br />

should be regarded very much as <strong>the</strong> so-called deutero-can<strong>on</strong>ical<br />

books of <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> ; though <strong>the</strong> circumstance that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are not cited in <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> can be nowise objected against •<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir genuineness, any more than <strong>the</strong> positi<strong>on</strong> of a <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong><br />

book am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Antilegomena can be c<strong>on</strong>sidered as a proof of its<br />

spuriousness. <strong>The</strong>se n<strong>on</strong>-cited books of <strong>the</strong> Old <strong>Testament</strong>, with<br />

<strong>the</strong> excepti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> three minor prophets, probably present some-<br />

thing like a transiti<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> apocryphal books. At all events, <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that <strong>the</strong>se books are nowhere menti<strong>on</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong><br />

should inculcate up<strong>on</strong> us cauti<strong>on</strong> in making use of <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Of more importance than <strong>the</strong> citati<strong>on</strong>s, are such passages of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> as c<strong>on</strong>tain decisive declarati<strong>on</strong>s respecting <strong>the</strong> Old<br />

<strong>Testament</strong> as a whole. <strong>The</strong>se occur particularly in <strong>the</strong> discourses<br />

of our Lord himslf. Jesus calls <strong>the</strong> law (Matth. v. 17 seq.) eternal,<br />

imperishable. Heaven and earth, he says, shall pass away, but not<br />

<strong>on</strong>e jot or tittle of <strong>the</strong> law shall pass aWay till all be fulfilled. In a<br />

similar manner, in Luke xxiv. 44, prophecy c<strong>on</strong>cerning Christ is re-<br />

presented as something running through <strong>the</strong> law of Moses, <strong>the</strong><br />

Prophets, and <strong>the</strong> Psalms, and as necessary to be fulfilled. In Luke<br />

xvi. 17, also, all created things (heaven and earth), it is said, wiU<br />

so<strong>on</strong>er and more easily pass away than <strong>the</strong> Law and <strong>the</strong> Prophets.<br />

Thus a lofty divine character is clearly claimed in behalf of <strong>the</strong> Old<br />

<strong>Testament</strong>. It may, indeed, be observed <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trary, that, in<br />

<strong>the</strong> passages refeiTed to, allusi<strong>on</strong> is made, not to <strong>the</strong> whole Old<br />

<strong>Testament</strong>, but <strong>on</strong>ly to particular books, <strong>the</strong> Mosaic law, <strong>the</strong><br />

Prophets, and <strong>the</strong> Psalms. But, first, it is to be noticed, that <strong>the</strong><br />

expressi<strong>on</strong>. Law, or Law and Prophets, stands frequently for <strong>the</strong><br />

whole Old <strong>Testament</strong>, just as Gospel stands for <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>New</strong><br />

1 <strong>The</strong> Old <strong>Testament</strong> is expressly cited in <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> more than four hundred times,<br />

and in a much larger number of places <strong>the</strong>re are allusi<strong>on</strong>s to tlie Old <strong>Testament</strong>.<br />

2 <strong>The</strong> Books of Ezra, Nehemiah, Es<strong>the</strong>r, Ecclesiastes, and Solom<strong>on</strong>'s S<strong>on</strong>g, as also<br />

<strong>the</strong> minor Prophets, Obadiah, Nahum, and Zephaniah. It is most proper, however, to<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sider <strong>the</strong> twelve Prophets as <strong>on</strong>e work; and <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>se three are not<br />

cited loses its force. But in regard to o<strong>the</strong>r books of <strong>the</strong> Old <strong>Testament</strong> <strong>the</strong> cixcum-<br />

stance that <strong>the</strong>y are not cited is not unimportant.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!