20.09.2013 Views

Biblical commentary on the New Testament - The Christian ...

Biblical commentary on the New Testament - The Christian ...

Biblical commentary on the New Testament - The Christian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mat<strong>the</strong>w XVI. 23-26. 553<br />

Christ's life no unholy thought could flow ; but precisely because<br />

he was to be a c<strong>on</strong>queror of sin, it had to draw near, that in every<br />

form he might overthrow it ; and in his human nature, which <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

by degrees received within itself <strong>the</strong> whole fulness of <strong>the</strong> Divine life,<br />

sin, when it drew near, made up<strong>on</strong> him an impressi<strong>on</strong>. Such a<br />

sacred moment have we here. With <strong>the</strong> glance of his soul, <strong>the</strong><br />

Saviour at <strong>on</strong>ce penetrate;] <strong>the</strong> source whence sprang this far he it<br />

from <strong>the</strong>e, and killed <strong>the</strong> springing evil in its very root. This<br />

explains at <strong>on</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> import of <strong>the</strong> oaravd, which was addressed to<br />

Peter (a-gacpelg elrre tw nt-rpoj). <strong>The</strong> opini<strong>on</strong> that Peter is here<br />

termed a wicked counsellor, or even an adversary* (from -,u'^), stands<br />

completely self-refuted ; <strong>the</strong> rock of <strong>the</strong> church cannot possibly be<br />

at <strong>the</strong> same time an adversary, and assuredly Peter did not, by having<br />

spoken <strong>the</strong>se words, cease to be <strong>the</strong> rock of tlie church. <strong>The</strong><br />

oaravag, Satan, is n<strong>on</strong>e o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> ap;^ci)v rov kooiiov tov-ov, ruler<br />

of this ivorld, who has his work in <strong>the</strong> children of unbelief (Ephes.<br />

ii. 2), and also in <strong>the</strong> children of faith, in so far as <strong>the</strong> Spirit of<br />

Chi-ist has as yet not sanctified <strong>the</strong>m, i. e., in so far as <strong>the</strong> old man,<br />

still exposed to sinful influences, yet hves in <strong>the</strong>m. This influence<br />

had Peter (as <strong>the</strong> organ of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, who are to be c<strong>on</strong>ceived of<br />

as under <strong>the</strong> same guilt) admitted into his heart without knowing<br />

what he did. Our Lord, however, brings him to <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sciousness<br />

of what he was doing, by naming <strong>the</strong> element from which sprang<br />

<strong>the</strong> thought that he had been weak enough to utter. Thus, as in<br />

<strong>the</strong> foregoing c<strong>on</strong>fessi<strong>on</strong> (ver. 16), <strong>the</strong> Divine element was seen<br />

predominant in Peter, so evil now asserts its power over him ; and<br />

here, <strong>the</strong>refore, we have in his case an exhibiti<strong>on</strong> of that ebbing<br />

and flowing of spiritual life, which every <strong>on</strong>e experiences who<br />

has felt in his heart <strong>the</strong> redeeming power of Christ, Where<br />

sin is powerful, <strong>the</strong>re does grace excel in power (Rom, v, 20) ; c<strong>on</strong>-<br />

versely, however, where grace is mighty, <strong>the</strong>re sin also puts itself<br />

mightily forth,<br />

Yer. 24-26.—Immediately after <strong>the</strong>se words, Jesus, transferring<br />

his discourse from <strong>the</strong> immediate circle of his disciples to a more<br />

extensive audience (according to Mark and Luke), subjoins an<br />

adm<strong>on</strong>iti<strong>on</strong> up<strong>on</strong> self-denial. <strong>The</strong> thoughts <strong>the</strong>mselves we have<br />

already unfolded at Matth, x. 37, seq. ; <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly inquiry here is,<br />

what associati<strong>on</strong> of ideas c<strong>on</strong>nects <strong>the</strong>se verses with <strong>the</strong> foregoing.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that Christ must die, does not seem fo imply as a neces-<br />

sary c<strong>on</strong>sequence, <strong>the</strong> death of his disciples, for indeed Christ died<br />

expressly that we might live. Of bodily death this is undoubtedly<br />

true, but <strong>the</strong> life and death of Jesus is a pattern for his church (1<br />

* As regards <strong>the</strong> mere usage of <strong>the</strong> words, this explanati<strong>on</strong> may be justified by refer-<br />

ring to such passages as 1 Kings xi. 14 ; 2 Sam. xix. 22. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong>, how-<br />

eyer 'jarai'dg never occurs in <strong>the</strong> sense of adversary.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!