20.09.2013 Views

Biblical commentary on the New Testament - The Christian ...

Biblical commentary on the New Testament - The Christian ...

Biblical commentary on the New Testament - The Christian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

580<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w XVIII. 6.<br />

be at peace am<strong>on</strong>g yourselves, again points back to <strong>the</strong> strife am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> disciples, from which <strong>the</strong> discourse took its rise. We must <strong>the</strong>n<br />

prove that <strong>the</strong>se words respecting <strong>the</strong> oKavdaXi^eiv stand c<strong>on</strong>nected<br />

with <strong>the</strong> entire discourse. For, even granting that <strong>the</strong>y had origin-<br />

ally been spoken in o<strong>the</strong>r circumstances by <strong>the</strong> Lord, this much is<br />

clear, that both evangelists meant here to place <strong>the</strong>m in a fitting<br />

c<strong>on</strong>nexi<strong>on</strong>. It <strong>on</strong>ly remains, <strong>the</strong>n, that we regard <strong>the</strong> sense of /ii/cpof,<br />

little, as modified in such a way that <strong>the</strong> expressi<strong>on</strong> here forms <strong>the</strong><br />

counterpart of iJ-^yag, great. Usually <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> employs <strong>the</strong><br />

term [iiKpog, little, little <strong>on</strong>e, to denote believers, <strong>the</strong> regenerate in<br />

general (see more fully <strong>on</strong> this point at Matth. x. 42), but again we<br />

also find a distincti<strong>on</strong> drawn between <strong>the</strong> great and <strong>the</strong> small in <strong>the</strong><br />

kingdom of God (see at Matth. xi. 11, and v. 19). Applying this<br />

distincti<strong>on</strong> here, <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>nexi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> passage may be taken in this<br />

way. <strong>The</strong> strife am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> disciples as to <strong>the</strong>ir place in <strong>the</strong> kingdom<br />

of God might have given off'ence to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r believers, so that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y were perplexed as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> truth dwelt within <strong>the</strong> circle<br />

where such things could occur. This led <strong>the</strong> Lord to declare his<br />

mind as to <strong>the</strong> guilt of those who gave offence, even to <strong>the</strong> weakest<br />

am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> believers. <strong>The</strong> seventh verse, in Matth. however, seems<br />

to be in oppositi<strong>on</strong> to this view of <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>nexi<strong>on</strong>, for <strong>the</strong> offences<br />

are <strong>the</strong>re ascribed to <strong>the</strong> world. But in reference to this, we must<br />

observe, that <strong>the</strong> disciples, in so far as <strong>the</strong>y gave offence to believers,<br />

did <strong>the</strong>mselves bel<strong>on</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> world, and thus <strong>the</strong> Saviour here<br />

passes over from <strong>the</strong> particular to <strong>the</strong> general, just as at Matth. xvi.<br />

23, he traces Peter's declarati<strong>on</strong> at <strong>on</strong>ce to <strong>the</strong> origin of evil from<br />

whose influence he was not yet wholly free. With this, also, ver. 8,<br />

seq., well agrees, where he speaks of self-offence {Lavrov oKavdaXi^etv),<br />

man being thus presented as in a c<strong>on</strong>flict between <strong>the</strong> new and <strong>the</strong><br />

old principles of his nature.<br />

As to <strong>the</strong> meaning of andvdaXov, <strong>the</strong> old form of <strong>the</strong> word oKav-<br />

ddXriTpov properly denotes a trap for ensnaring animals, <strong>the</strong>n in<br />

general, a noose, a snare, laying loait for. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong><br />

it is transferred to spiritual things, and under oicdvdaXov everything<br />

is included which can hinder <strong>the</strong> development of spiritual life, or<br />

deter men from faith in <strong>the</strong> Divine = KpooKOfj.jj.a, in Hebrew ^|5'», a<br />

cord, a noose, or Vs tsa offence. (On this account also in <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong><br />

<strong>Testament</strong>, rrayig, d/jpa, stand c<strong>on</strong>nected with <strong>on</strong>avdalov, see Rom.<br />

xi. 9.) <strong>The</strong> verb oKavdaXLC^eiv c<strong>on</strong>sequently means to give offence,<br />

to prepare spiritual obstructi<strong>on</strong>, oKavdaXi^eaOai, to take offence.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a peculiarity, however, in <strong>the</strong> meaning of oKavdaAi(^etv in<br />

ver. 8, of this passage, according to which <strong>the</strong> oKavdaXi^ojv and <strong>the</strong><br />

oKavdaXi^ojiEvog appear united in <strong>the</strong> same individual. This internal<br />

c<strong>on</strong>flict in man himself is to be explained, as has been already said,<br />

fiom regenerati<strong>on</strong>, through which <strong>the</strong> new man is brought into life

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!