25.12.2013 Views

Art Criticism - The State University of New York

Art Criticism - The State University of New York

Art Criticism - The State University of New York

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Recasting the <strong>Art</strong> History Survey:<br />

Ethics and Truth in the Classroom Community<br />

Michael Schwartz<br />

"One <strong>of</strong> the greatest <strong>of</strong> these [non-democratic] restrictive<br />

mechanisms is the present-day school, because it does not<br />

develop people but channels them."l<br />

- Joseph Beuys,<br />

"Not Just a Few Are Called, But Everyone"<br />

Introduction<br />

Over the past decade or so there has been much talk about recasting<br />

the traditional art history survey.2 Most <strong>of</strong> the criticisms have been directed at<br />

course structure and content: the limits <strong>of</strong> formal and stylistic analysis; the<br />

dearth <strong>of</strong> social and political contextualization; the injustices <strong>of</strong> neocolonialist<br />

and patriarchal frameworks; the one-sidedly monumental approach to the historical<br />

past; the uncritical celebration <strong>of</strong> Modernism; and so on. 3 <strong>The</strong> great<br />

merit <strong>of</strong> the symposium panel organized by Susan Glasser is that it has finally<br />

opens up focused discussion about the scene <strong>of</strong> teaching.4 For even if we<br />

alter what We teach - changing the canon, shifting our analytic frameworks -<br />

this does not in itself effect how we organize classroom practice. Whether one<br />

expounds on open form in Rembrandt or sexual politics in Bonheur, the lecture<br />

format foregrounds and consecrates the teacher's institutional authority and<br />

singular claim to truth.<br />

This paper will address how we might facilitate a more genuine community<strong>of</strong><br />

autonomous thinkers in the art-historical classroom. Its argument is<br />

divided into five sections. <strong>The</strong> first is on the strategic importance <strong>of</strong> establishing<br />

sites <strong>of</strong> community in modernity. <strong>The</strong> second is on the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong><br />

classroom obligations. <strong>The</strong> third examines tensions between nurturing a<br />

communal ethic and speaking the truth <strong>of</strong> art. <strong>The</strong> fourth moves us towards<br />

inventing a classroom community, <strong>of</strong>fering a number <strong>of</strong> re-arrangements <strong>of</strong><br />

pedagogical practice so to facilitate student construction <strong>of</strong> course content.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fifth and longest, which complements and fills out the earlier sections <strong>of</strong><br />

the study, contends that the themes <strong>of</strong> the survey course should directly·<br />

engage issues at stake within our own visual culture so that art history can<br />

104<br />

<strong>Art</strong> <strong>Criticism</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!