25.12.2013 Views

Art Criticism - The State University of New York

Art Criticism - The State University of New York

Art Criticism - The State University of New York

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

iterating the teacher's authority and disrupting the communal spirit. This is an<br />

instance <strong>of</strong> the abiding tension between facilitating the formation <strong>of</strong> student<br />

community and guiding rigorous approaches to the study <strong>of</strong> works <strong>of</strong> art.<br />

<strong>Art</strong> History as Critical Hermeneutic <strong>of</strong> Modernity<br />

1. Spectacular Conditions<br />

Let us say that a particular art history survey class is working well,<br />

that the students have formed a community <strong>of</strong> interpreters, and that they have<br />

forged considerable skill at visual analysis. What then is the critical social<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> a course in art history as opposed to literature, philosophy, or<br />

general cultural studies?<br />

It is a truism <strong>of</strong> contemporary thought that we live in a society bombarded<br />

with images; in the extreme Baudrillardian version, the world has become<br />

an imagistic simulacrum. Because <strong>of</strong> its longstanding investigation <strong>of</strong><br />

images, art history would seem to be the established academic discipline best<br />

prepared to reflect historically on the emergence and shape <strong>of</strong> the spectacle.<br />

Refigured more broadly as the study <strong>of</strong> visual culture, courses in art history<br />

would empower students to cope with the mediascape in which they live. And<br />

yet this laudable project <strong>of</strong> reform, which many people are developing in their<br />

classrooms, commonly fails to advance an actual critical engagement with<br />

images.<br />

When art history is pressed into service as an intervention into cultural<br />

politics, the images shown in the classroon are typically deployed as foils<br />

for introducing a prior discursive agenda about identity, gender, sexuality,<br />

postcolonialism, multiculturalism, and so on - hence without regard for an<br />

image's historical specificity qua image. <strong>The</strong> "logocentricity" <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

art-historical methods, like iconography, has been maintained in postmodern<br />

approaches, sometimes with the stated intent <strong>of</strong> advancing the linguistic turn<br />

proper to the human sciences. 21 This is not to say that study <strong>of</strong> the differing<br />

historical modes <strong>of</strong> pictorial signification is not an important topic. On the<br />

contrary. For exemplary studies in this regard - which are sensitive to (I) the<br />

non-linguistic character <strong>of</strong> pictorial semiosis; (2) the figurative mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />

pictorial sense; and (3) the historical institutions <strong>of</strong> signification - see Mark<br />

Roskill's recent work on landscape and portraiture. <strong>The</strong>se new interpretive<br />

frameworks are most welcome for the revitalization and renewal <strong>of</strong> the discipline;<br />

for they have broadened the kinds <strong>of</strong> questions we ask <strong>of</strong> the visual<br />

past. But such frameworks regularly do not take into account the ontological<br />

specificity <strong>of</strong> images. It remains therefore to be seen how art history, even<br />

when broadened into a history <strong>of</strong> images, might singularly contribute to and<br />

extend a critical hermeneutics <strong>of</strong> modernity.<br />

vol. 17, no. 1 111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!