25.12.2013 Views

Art Criticism - The State University of New York

Art Criticism - The State University of New York

Art Criticism - The State University of New York

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

still is traditionally associated with the psychological makeup <strong>of</strong> artists. Many<br />

<strong>of</strong> the literary and artistic masters <strong>of</strong> the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries<br />

exhibited "token" hysterical traits. Those with decadent personalities (traditionally<br />

male literary and artistic figures) <strong>of</strong>ten have within their psyche<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> hysteria. Famous examples are Baudelaire and Oscar Wilde. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

men are <strong>of</strong>ten seen as "tormented by their time," but women, exhibiting similar<br />

traits <strong>of</strong> the decadent personality, are viewed as hysterics. As we well know,<br />

Baudelaire and Wilde were not universally admired during their lives. But they<br />

were not placed within the confines <strong>of</strong> a mental institution or thought <strong>of</strong> as<br />

incurably "mad." This splitting, in which male symptoms are regarded as inherently<br />

"positive" and female symptoms as inherently "negative," clearly shows<br />

strict stereotyping <strong>of</strong> male in contrast to female roles.<br />

<strong>The</strong> brothers Edmund and Jules Goncourt represented many such<br />

decadent personalities in their work, and at times exhibited hysterical attributes<br />

themselves. 38 Much <strong>of</strong> their writing, including a jointly written account <strong>of</strong> their<br />

daily lives from 1851-1896,39 is preoccupied with illness and degeneration. 40<br />

Jules, the more "highly strung and delicate" <strong>of</strong>the two brothers, suffered from<br />

a nervous breakdown before dying in June <strong>of</strong> 1879. He was described during<br />

his life as volatile, quick-witted, mischievous and spoiled. Edmund, the older <strong>of</strong><br />

the two, was slow, serious, poetic, eccentric, and phlegmatic. 41 Robert Baldick,<br />

the translator <strong>of</strong> their Journal, describes the men:<br />

This astonishing partnership owed its cohesion and duration-for<br />

the Goncourts lived and worked together for over twenty years<br />

with never more than a few hours apart-not only to the brothers'<br />

affection and regard for each other but also to their fear, suspicion,<br />

and dislike <strong>of</strong> the outside world. <strong>The</strong>y were sick men, tortured by<br />

their stomachs, their livers, and their nerves; sick men with high<br />

ideals, living in a world where everything and everyone wounded<br />

their delicate sensibilities or outraged their sense <strong>of</strong> values. 42<br />

It becomes apparent from this passage that the Goncourts themselves<br />

disdained the modern way <strong>of</strong> life (which made them "nervous") as did the<br />

patients in previously mentioned cases <strong>of</strong> female hysteria or "nervousness."<br />

<strong>The</strong> other component <strong>of</strong> their ailments were their problematic family and sexual<br />

lives, which they <strong>of</strong>ten recall in the Journal. <strong>The</strong>se events clearly contributed<br />

. to their menta!' illness. More particularly, the Goncourts <strong>of</strong>ten write <strong>of</strong> their<br />

disdain and disgust for women-a theme prevalent in almost all decadent<br />

literature. 43<br />

In 1870, in a discussion with Zola, the brothers stated that "the originality<br />

<strong>of</strong> their work rested on nervous maladies," presumably in themselves<br />

and in others.44 <strong>The</strong> brothers saw their "hysteria" as a necessary component<br />

94<br />

<strong>Art</strong> <strong>Criticism</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!