Art Criticism - The State University of New York
Art Criticism - The State University of New York
Art Criticism - The State University of New York
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
From Diagnoses to Decadence:<br />
A Brief History <strong>of</strong> Hysteria<br />
Kristen Oelrich<br />
In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, most doctors and<br />
physicians attributed the disease <strong>of</strong> hysteria almost exclusively to the female<br />
sex. This linkage between women and hysteria is a tradition thousands <strong>of</strong><br />
years old. Women were, and <strong>of</strong>ten still are, seen stereotypically as more vulnerable<br />
both mentally and physically to hysteria. <strong>The</strong> term hysteria is derived from<br />
the Greek hystera meaning womb. Hysteria's medical definition was taken to<br />
mean literally, "wandering womb," as doctors attributed the effects <strong>of</strong> hysteria<br />
to the womb wandering throughout the female body. Hysteria, or "wandering<br />
womb" was <strong>of</strong>ten diagnosed in women who were experiencing trouble talking<br />
or breathing. What today we would call "having a lump in one's throat" was at<br />
one time thought to be the woman's uterus trapped near her vocal cords,<br />
thereby inhibiting vocal communication. I<br />
Many female patients who were diagnosed as hysterics in the nineteenth<br />
and twentieth centuries were unwilling to conform to the conventions<br />
<strong>of</strong> marriage, tended to be interested in community and suffrage movements,<br />
and were seen as more independent and assertive than "normal" women? Our<br />
contemporary notion <strong>of</strong> independent women was diagnosed as hysteria by<br />
most doctors in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Today, knowledge<br />
<strong>of</strong> hysteria is heavily influenced by key figures who studied the malady at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> nineteenth and twentieth centuries.<br />
<strong>The</strong> major focus <strong>of</strong> this paper will be on these figures and how they<br />
have contributed to the study <strong>of</strong> hysteria through scientific, psychological,<br />
sociological, and literary discourse. Hysteria as a malady will be looked at as a<br />
psychological component contributing to what figures like Max Nordau have<br />
called the decadent or degenerate personality.' Nordau has also argued that<br />
the increased presence or awareness <strong>of</strong> hysteria within a community or group<br />
is indicative <strong>of</strong> mounting societal decadence. I would like to argue that in the<br />
twentieth century fin-de-siecle, hysteria, although no longer employed as a<br />
diagnostic term, was and still is manifest - in fact rampant - within American<br />
society. Thisfin-de-siecle hysteria <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century has ties to Gustave<br />
Le Bon's theories <strong>of</strong> the crowd and these connections will be demonstrated.<br />
Although expressed under the guise <strong>of</strong> new names, hysteria has not disappeared<br />
from a contemporary society if that society is at all within the clutches<br />
<strong>of</strong> decadence.<br />
86<br />
<strong>Art</strong> <strong>Criticism</strong>