Art Criticism - The State University of New York
Art Criticism - The State University of New York
Art Criticism - The State University of New York
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
action to take. Renaissance painting marked a epochal shift in the history <strong>of</strong><br />
Western images by laying out more specifically how one ought to conduct<br />
oneself.<br />
Inheriting the modes <strong>of</strong> representation proper to postmedieval visual<br />
culture, modernity transformed and intensified pictorial mimesis. Along with a<br />
quantitative explosion and dispersion <strong>of</strong> pictorial imagery, one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
significant changes has been the emergence <strong>of</strong> moving pictures, which with<br />
regard to the mimetic imaginary provide a temporalIy more precise and intensive<br />
manner <strong>of</strong> modeling comportments. 33 I would suggest that there is a<br />
paralIel development in the history <strong>of</strong> pictorial mimesis. Medieval images <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
limits-ideal <strong>of</strong> proper conduct yet present few precise models for how one is to<br />
emulate the saintly life in actual worldly practice. In contrast, postmedieval<br />
pictures model specific actions; they are more intensely mimetic and more akin<br />
to disciplining behavior. Moroever, this latter modality <strong>of</strong> picturing has been<br />
intensified and transformed in modernity through the advent <strong>of</strong> moving images<br />
which model temporally the minutiae <strong>of</strong> bodily activity. With practices <strong>of</strong><br />
mutual recognition never quite living up to the diffuse but pervasive promise'<br />
<strong>of</strong> community, we compensate by readily "buying into" the imaginary senses<br />
<strong>of</strong> self embodied in the images.<strong>of</strong> the mediascape. So, even from this alI too<br />
brief account, I hope it is fair to say that our understanding <strong>of</strong> the stakes and<br />
contours <strong>of</strong> the mimetic imaginary in contemporary visual culture has been<br />
enhanced through our reformulation <strong>of</strong> art history as a critical hermeneutic <strong>of</strong><br />
our times.<br />
No doubt I have under argued for what an historical ontology <strong>of</strong><br />
images might look like; and the historical scheme <strong>of</strong> medieval, postmedieval,<br />
and modern visual cultures to which I refer is barely a sketch. But my intent in<br />
this final section <strong>of</strong> the paper has only been to indicate ways the art history<br />
survey might be wrought to focus genuine critical reflection upon the spectacle<br />
<strong>of</strong> modernity. (Another crucial theme, beyond the purview <strong>of</strong> this discussion,<br />
is the autonimization <strong>of</strong> art in modernity, and art's consequent internalization<br />
<strong>of</strong> and resistance to spectacular culture.) <strong>The</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> such themes<br />
into classroom discussion can readily promote the community <strong>of</strong> studentsinterpreters<br />
to re-think their ways within the sight lines <strong>of</strong> contemporary existence.<br />
For it has been my experience that rather than making the survey class<br />
more abstract and obscure, themes like pictorial mimesis help bring discussion<br />
to bear more directly and concretely on the students' own everyday experiences<br />
and life frustrations.<br />
In this essay I have been advancing that we transform the art history<br />
survey into a community <strong>of</strong> student interpreters. This entails foregrounding<br />
educational imperatives above administrative and pr<strong>of</strong>essional obligations. I<br />
have gone further and advocated that this is may not be enough, that art<br />
vol. 17, no. 1 115