28.12.2013 Views

The Making of a Good White - E-thesis - Helsinki.fi

The Making of a Good White - E-thesis - Helsinki.fi

The Making of a Good White - E-thesis - Helsinki.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

money, and the CHL was still designing its methods <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation.<br />

It was considered important that the upliftment <strong>of</strong> the poor whites was<br />

conducted ‘scienti<strong>fi</strong>cally’. <strong>The</strong> various social sciences’ theories – as formulated<br />

by their practitioners abroad – were introduced. <strong>The</strong> influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Carnegie Commission’s research, as well as Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Batson’s<br />

thumbprints could be observed in the ways the Company ran its housing<br />

projects. <strong>The</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> suitable families was seen as the key to success,<br />

and the <strong>fi</strong>rst generation <strong>of</strong> residents chosen to reside in EGV had to meet<br />

certain prerequisites.<br />

At the time, being a poor white and respectability were not mutually<br />

exclusive qualities. In the minds <strong>of</strong> South Africans there was still a difference<br />

between arm blankes and blanke armes (Marijke du Toit 1992:<br />

7). Also the Carnegie Commission’s research report had divided the poor<br />

whites into the ‘naturally poor’ who were poor because <strong>of</strong> their personal<br />

qualities, and the ‘deserving poor’ who were destitute because <strong>of</strong> external<br />

circumstances. (Rothmann 1932: 166; Albertyn 1932: 1-21.) In the<br />

1930s, the housing companies only wanted to accommodate the deserving<br />

poor who had the potential to become good whites.<br />

Parnell describes the selection procedure to qualify for a poor white<br />

housing estate in Johannesburg as stringent (1988a: 585). Evidence<br />

shows that it was no less dif<strong>fi</strong>cult to obtain a home in Epping Garden<br />

Village in the 1930s and the 1940s. Settling in the area was, furthermore,<br />

a complicated process. Before the residents were selected, a detailed application<br />

form had to be <strong>fi</strong>lled in, and be accompanied by references from<br />

the applicant’s employer and church minister. <strong>The</strong>n a social worker visited<br />

the applicants in their homes and interviewed them. Only after this<br />

pre-monitoring were the applicants interviewed by the selection committee.<br />

(CHL: Report <strong>of</strong> the Selection Committee 1937.)<br />

Nuclear families with children and an income <strong>of</strong> more than £10 a<br />

month but less than £20 were favoured in this selection procedure. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

were people who already had a stable lifestyle brought about by parenthood<br />

and a permanent income, but who were still starting their careers.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y were the candidates most likely to succeed. (CHL, SWR 114 : 1937.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> heads <strong>of</strong> these families were in the prime <strong>of</strong> their working age. In<br />

1942 only 32 persons, or 0.6 per cent <strong>of</strong> the Epping Garden Village residents<br />

received an old age pension. (CHL Survey: 1942.)<br />

114 Citizens’ Housing League, Social Welfare Committee Resolutions, Minutes and Reports.<br />

All the quotes with regard to the CHL originate from the archives <strong>of</strong> Communicare<br />

(formerly the Citizens’ Housing League).<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!