The Making of a Good White - E-thesis - Helsinki.fi
The Making of a Good White - E-thesis - Helsinki.fi
The Making of a Good White - E-thesis - Helsinki.fi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
orities and class character had to be rede<strong>fi</strong>ned. <strong>The</strong> labouring classes had<br />
to be integrated into the volk, and mobilised for the economic struggle,<br />
since any resistance from the white working class would threaten the petit<br />
bourgeoisie and the developing economic movement. (O’Meara 1983:<br />
107-116.)<br />
Poor whites were to have their own role in the process <strong>of</strong> building<br />
the great nation, and the ideology <strong>of</strong> teaching the poor to save and reeducating<br />
them was central to these attempts (1934 Conference Report).<br />
Harmonising class relations was seen as important for the unity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Afrikaner volk. <strong>The</strong> virtues <strong>of</strong> hard labour and saving were emphasised,<br />
and working-class Afrikaners were controlled by a Christian-nationalist<br />
dogma. (O’Meara 1983: 158-164.)<br />
In the 1930s and 1940s the Broederbond blamed the vulnerable position<br />
<strong>of</strong> unskilled Afrikaner workers on the English, Jewish or communist<br />
enemies <strong>of</strong> the volk. <strong>The</strong> white working class was taught that economic<br />
prizes were achievable by emphasising the racial rather than the class barrier.<br />
(O’Meara 1983: 82, 89.)<br />
In his account <strong>of</strong> the invention <strong>of</strong> tradition in colonial Africa, Terence<br />
Ranger notes how the white workers in South Africa used invented rituals<br />
<strong>of</strong> European craft unionism to exclude Africans from participating<br />
the unions, and to claim craft status. Importing European traditions into<br />
Africa also made it easier to rule the Africans as an underclass. However,<br />
this increased the demands on the whites, since they had to become an<br />
organised and respectable racial elite. (Ranger 1983: 215-220.)<br />
Peter Worsley has noted the position <strong>of</strong> working-class whites in South<br />
Africa as a ”labour aristocracy”, and how they were well aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />
meaning <strong>of</strong> institutionalised inequality in respect <strong>of</strong> their own prosperity.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y were willing to defend it with racism <strong>of</strong> a ”more atavistic order,<br />
rooted in fear, on the part <strong>of</strong> those at the lowest levels <strong>of</strong> class hierarchy,<br />
that their social status will now be reduced to that <strong>of</strong> Blacks”. (Worsley<br />
1984: 240-242.) However, it was the white South African elite who had<br />
carefully planted seeds <strong>of</strong> this ’atavistic’ racism.<br />
Christian-national Ideology and the Poor <strong>White</strong> Problem<br />
<strong>The</strong> Dutch Reformed Church (DRC) lead the actions against white poverty<br />
from the very start. It had extended its influence in the middle years <strong>of</strong><br />
the nineteenth century, and in the 1880s it took a new interest in the poor<br />
40