EVEREST June, 2013 - California Department of Boating and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Orange County Coastal Regional Sediment Management Plan Table 4.1 continued ACTIVITY PRIORITY TYPE STATE DURATION Establish Funding Stream to Accommodate Incremental RSM Costs Medium Construction Potential Ongoing Sea Level Rise Beach Sustainability Study Low Plan Performance Potential Project Orange County Dredge Ownership Low Construction Potential Ongoing Sand Retention Feasibility Study Low Plan Performance Potential Project Huntington Harbour Dredging with Beach or Nearshore Placement Low Construction Potential Recurring Update the Plan Low Plan Performance Potential Recurring Update Sediment Budget for Laguna Beach Littoral Cell Low Plan Performance Potential Project Investigate Methods to Assess and Mitigate for Upstream Sand Mining Low Governance and Regulations Potential Ongoing Study Large Grain Size Impacts at East Beach, Seal Beach Low Plan Performance Potential Project Update Sediment Transport Studies for Southern Orange County Low Plan Performance Potential Project Everest International Consultants, Inc. 4.3
Orange County Coastal Regional Sediment Management Plan 4.2 Develop a Governance Structure A governance structure provides a framework for the Plan to be used, including interpretations, updates and implementation of particular activities. The governance structure represents a coordinated implementation approach that provides a framework for input from citizens as well as federal, state, regional, and local entities. Any governance structure to be adopted would require extensive consideration and discussion among coastal public agencies. This Plan activity would be to begin collaborative discussions amongst the many local and regional agencies to consider starting a new JPA or joining an existing JPA. A recommended governance structure for the Plan is provided below. Recommended Governance Structure The Plan recommends a governance structure for implementation of RSM in Orange County by developing a new JPA following the model laid out by BEACON. Using SCAG as the governance structure is not recommended since the SCAG region covers all of southern California some of which is already covered by other JPAs such as SANDAG and BEACON. The OCCOG is not recommended since it does not include Los Angeles, Riverside, or San Diego Counties, which are included in the sedimentsheds within the Plan. Possible names for this new JPA are: Sustainable Beaches of Orange County (SBOC), Orange County Area Governments Beach Authority (OCAGBA), and Orange County Area Sedimentshed Authority (OCASA). In this structure the JPA would act as the lead planning and coordinating agency which adopts, seeks funds, administers grants and studies, assists with implementation activities as deemed necessary by the local implementing agencies, facilitates collaboration on coastal issues, works to fill data gaps, and maintains and updates the Plan. The JPA would receive funds, complete environmental documentation, acquire regional permits as appropriate, and plan coastal projects, as appropriate. Local land use decision-making and implementation would remain with the local agencies. The JPA would be defined as the lead-planning agency for coastal RSM issues and other erosion control measures. Examples of other erosion control measures include seawalls, sand retention reefs, perched beaches, groins, revetments, breakwaters, and headland enhancement. This Plan recommends that the JPA hire a dedicated staff member to assist the executive director to specifically manage coastal RSM issues and coordinate with other staff. The executive director would be advised and guided on RSM issues by a committee comprising of representatives from regional and local governments, academic institutions, industry, and nonprofit organizations. The executive director would then report to a board of directors. Everest International Consultants, Inc. 4.4
Page 1 and 2:
Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Eng
Page 3 and 4:
Orange County Coastal Regional Sedi
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90: Orange County Coastal Regional Sedi
Page 139: Orange County Coastal Regional Sedi
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
show all

EVEREST June, 2013 - California Department of Boating and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?