30.12.2013 Views

EVEREST June, 2013 - California Department of Boating and ...

EVEREST June, 2013 - California Department of Boating and ...

EVEREST June, 2013 - California Department of Boating and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Orange County Coastal Regional Sediment Management Plan<br />

list <strong>of</strong> impaired water bodies after USEPA found unacceptable levels <strong>of</strong> polychlorinated<br />

biphenyls (PCBs) <strong>and</strong> dieldrin. Since much <strong>of</strong> the shoaling identified in 2000 was located near<br />

drainage outlets, there is concern that the sediment buildup might be so contaminated with toxic<br />

metals, pesticides, <strong>and</strong> PCB’s that special dredging <strong>and</strong> other management measures may be<br />

required for sediment disposal. It is unknown if or how much <strong>of</strong> the sediment proposed to be<br />

dredged from Huntington Harbour can be placed on the beach or nearshore, so investigation<br />

into this matter is recommended.<br />

4.22 Update the Plan<br />

The Plan should be a living document that would benefit from periodic updates to add or modify<br />

data, information, underst<strong>and</strong>ing, <strong>and</strong> recommended activities. The Plan should be updated<br />

using a collaborative approach between the various stakeholders <strong>and</strong> led by either the new JPA<br />

(see Section 4.2) or Orange County <strong>and</strong> USACE. The update should include a review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

coastal RSM strategies outlined in the current Plan, modifications to activities based on lessons<br />

learned, <strong>and</strong> potential additional activities as appropriate. Much <strong>of</strong> the updated underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

should come as direct results from the studies recommended within the Plan activities. As with<br />

the current Plan, future modifications should be carried out in a transparent fashion with full<br />

cooperation <strong>and</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> the stakeholders <strong>and</strong> the public in general.<br />

4.23 Update Sediment Budget for Laguna Beach Littoral Cell<br />

The most recent sediment budget for the Laguna Beach Littoral Cell was for a time period<br />

ending in 1984 (USACE, 2002b). Given the large amount <strong>of</strong> development occurring in the area<br />

in the last 28 years, it is expected that sediment yields <strong>and</strong> the sediment budget for this area<br />

have changed significantly. This activity would be to update the sediment budget for the<br />

Laguna Beach Littoral Cell to better represent current conditions.<br />

4.24 Investigate Methods to Assess <strong>and</strong> Mitigate for Upstream S<strong>and</strong> Mining<br />

This activity would be to perform a study to identify methods to assess <strong>and</strong> mitigate for removal<br />

<strong>of</strong> beach s<strong>and</strong> from upstream creeks, streams <strong>and</strong> river beds.<br />

4.25 Study Large Grain Size Impacts at East Beach, Seal Beach<br />

This activity would be to perform a study to determine if use <strong>of</strong> larger than native grain sizes for<br />

beach nourishment has caused negative impacts to surfing or habitats at East Beach in Seal<br />

Beach. The positive effects <strong>of</strong> using large grain s<strong>and</strong> in beach nourishments are understood to<br />

increase beach width <strong>and</strong> increase s<strong>and</strong> retention, thus lowering maintenance costs, but<br />

potential negative impacts are less understood.<br />

Everest International Consultants, Inc. 4.16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!