EVEREST June, 2013 - California Department of Boating and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Orange County Coastal Regional Sediment Management Plan Orange County Coastal Regional Sediment Management Plan Stakeholder Meeting 3 - Minutes Monday, May 16, 2011, 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 3535 Harbor Boulevard, Suite 110, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Attending: Susie Ming, Susan Brodeur, Richard Gardner, Jeff Armstrong, Marsha Westropp, David Pryor, Daniel Apt, Ann Mesa, Chris Miller, David Webb, Terri Elliott, Carla Navarro, Jerry A. King., Karen Green, Seamus Innes, David Cannon, Phone: Lonnie Adams, Rachel Grandpre, Naram (OC Flood Control). Susie M. began introductions and presented CRSMP background. David C. presented OC CRSMP introduction. Seamus presented physical data collection. Richard G. pointed out that area between Dana Point and San Mateo Point is called San Clemente Bay. Add San Juan Creek to list of potential source materials. Karen G. presented biological data collection. Carla N. noted that Rocky Intertidal Marine Group of the Materials Management Agency (marine.gov) has maps of rocky intertidal areas that can be added to bio maps. Susan B. suggested adding MLPA and ASBS regions to bio maps. Check to make sure groins and jetties are in the bio maps as well. Check with City of Newport Beach for eelgrass survey data. David W. suggested we add natural gullies to list of sediment sources. Examples are found in the Laguna Littoral Cell such as Buck Gully. It may be useful to protect these sources in the future. Dave Webb knows the company OC Sediment ____ that cleans sediment traps in Orange County. David C. presented economic data collection and plan development. Richard G. asked that before use fees are increased it is important to identify maintenance costs to reduce the possibility of charging excessive fees for locations that require very little maintenance. The example of Trestles (San Mateo Point) was given because it requires very little maintenance; hence, there should be no fee or a very little one at the most. Carla N. suggested the plan should include more biologists to be inclusive of other information and knowledge. Karen G. and Susie M. explained the amount of detail currently included in the Everest International Consultants, Inc. A.12
Orange County Coastal Regional Sediment Management Plan Biological Impacts Assessment report. Recommended caution when dealing with fine material impact on submerged reefs. Jerry K. suggested using the sediment impoundment fee to remove arondo donax in an effort to free up trapped sediment in open streams. Carla N. suggested that the plan could add pressure to remove dams. David W. requested that the plan assist in streamlining the coastal permitting for maintenance activities. He requested ways to import more coarse material (e.g., river sand) into Newport Bay beaches so the placed material stays on the beaches longer. Chris M. explained that Regional General Permit 54 (USACE and CCC) allows for dredging and beach nourishment activities within the harbor; however, it must be renewed every five years at great expense and effort. He requested a way to streamline the permitting process that included all agencies and takes into account the fact that much of effort is maintenance so it should be covered under an exemption in the Coastal Act. He also noted that since the catch basins are effective at trapping coarse sand, most of the material that settles in the Newport Bay is fine grained. Richard G. suggested implementing a sand mining fee in addition to the sand impoundment fee. Add sand and gravel mining locations to source map. Can potentially use sand impoundment fee to pay for downstream erosion in addition to beach nourishment. Daniel A. suggested reviewing the South County Hydromodification Management Plan to coordinate erosion knowledge. David P. suggested adding Doheny to receiver sites list since it was recently nourished. Also, it would be useful to perform better monitoring to determine the benefits of these nourishment projects. He would like to know if these types of projects are worth the cost. Richard G. suggested more monitoring would be worthwhile to determine the success of any project. Suggested additional methods for determining project cost sharing even for projects that do not involve USACE. Important to identify stockpiling locations on GIS map. Carla N. would like to see high priority on monitoring of projects. Richard G. would like to see greater access to database of coastal information as part of the plan. Recommended monitoring and updating of the Management Plan to make it a living document. All agreed to allow one month after release of the draft plan prior to holding the next meeting. This should allow sufficient time for parties to review. Everest International Consultants, Inc. A.13
Page 1 and 2:
Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Eng
Page 3 and 4:
Orange County Coastal Regional Sedi
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132: Orange County Coastal Regional Sedi
Page 181: Orange County Coastal Regional Sedi
show all

EVEREST June, 2013 - California Department of Boating and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?