07.01.2014 Views

CHEM02200704003 Nilamadhab Pandhy - Homi Bhabha National ...

CHEM02200704003 Nilamadhab Pandhy - Homi Bhabha National ...

CHEM02200704003 Nilamadhab Pandhy - Homi Bhabha National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6<br />

Fig. 6.11b: Polarization study of uncoated and TiO 2 coated 304L SS in 8 M HNO 3 [22].<br />

Conc.<br />

Substrate condition<br />

E corr<br />

mV vs Ag/AgCl<br />

I pass<br />

µA/cm 2<br />

I corr<br />

µA/cm 2<br />

E transpass<br />

mV vs Ag/AgCl<br />

1 M Uncoated 250 1.1 × 10 2 10 ×10 0 1100<br />

1 M TiO 2 coated 360 10 × 10 0 5 ×10 -1 1250<br />

8 M Uncoated 340 1.2 × 10 3 7 ×10 1 1025<br />

8 M TiO 2 coated 550 5 × 10 2 4 × 10 1 1075<br />

Table. 6.4: Average value of polarization parameters for uncoated and TiO 2 coated 304L SS in 1<br />

M and 8 M HNO 3 [22].<br />

Decrease in passive current density in 1 M nitric acid was two orders of magnitude while<br />

in 8 M nitric acid it was one order of magnitude from uncoated to TiO 2 coated specimens. As<br />

compared to Ti coated specimens, the passive current density for TiO 2 coated specimens was onefifth<br />

in 1 M nitric acid, and half in 8 M nitric acid. The increase in transpassive potential

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!