ICMCEUROPE WelcometoEurope.pdf (5.89 MB)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

146 Chapter VI - European Resettlement Programmes and highlighted language-learning and employment as particular challenges in the Czech context. Strengths and Challenges Strengths • The Czech government has heavily invested in developing and implementing the resettlement programme, and has positively influenced public discourse on resettlement by linking the programme to humanitarian aspects of both foreign and migration policy. • Local authorities and NGO stakeholders are actively involved in the programme. The NGO Burma Centre Prague is one of the few ethnic associations that is directly involved in a national resettlement programme in Europe. • Municipalities invest significant time and resources in offering a welcoming community and in building support for resettlement amongst local populations. Challenges • Learning Czech is challenging. Both resettled refugees and NGOs consider that the language instruction available to refugees after the 6-month stay in the IAS is insufficient, particularly for those with low or no literacy in their first language, and a lack of Czech language proficiency has in some cases impacted negatively on the social and economic integration of resettled refugees. • The availability of housing drives placement decisions, and refugees have subsequently been spread across fairly disparate locations across the country. Resettled families have therefore had few opportunities to meet up with one another. • There is no strong culture of volunteering in the Czech Republic, and direct involvement of local communities in the integration of resettled refugees is therefore quite limited. New Developments At the time of writing, and after four years of involvement in refugee resettlement, the Czech government is drafting amendments to the ‘National Resettlement Programme Strategy’.
147 Denmark at a glance • Population: 5 580 516 • GDP (per capita): 125 PPS (available for 2011 only) PPS=Purchasing Power Standard, based on the EU 27 average of 100 • Asylum applications total : 6 045 • Positive decisions (refugee status, subsidiary protection and humanitarian reasons): 1 695 2012 data, published by Eurostat in May 2013 The Danish resettlement programme at a glance Resettlement quota and actors Start of annual quota: 1979 Current quota: approximately 500 per year. 3-year flexible quota of 1,500 in place since July 2005 enables unused places to be carried over from year to year within a 3-year period. The current flexible quota period runs from 2011 to 2013. Main national actors: Danish Immigration Service (DIS), Ministry of Justice, municipalities, Danish Refugee Council (DRC). Resettlement numbers 9 Year Accepted Arrivals 9 2013 anticipated Nationality Country of Asylum of largest groups 516 Bhutan Nepal, DR Congo Uganda, Colombia Ecuador 2012 468 Bhutan Nepal, Burma Malaysia, Colombia Ecuador 2011 516 Bhutan Nepal, Burma Malaysia, DR of Congo Zimbabwe 2010 494 Bhutan Nepal, Burma Malaysia, DR of Congo Kenya 2009 452 Bhutan Nepal, Burma Malaysia, DR of Congo Rwanda 9 Arrivals are not recorded in national statistics CHAPTER VI CHAPTER VII
Page 1 and 2:
Welcome to Europe! A comprehensive
Page 3 and 4:
Welcome to Europe! A comprehensive
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgements 3 We would like to
Page 7 and 8:
3.3. Burmese refugees in Thailand a
Page 9 and 10:
Chapter VII - Building a new life i
Page 11 and 12:
States have the primary responsibil
Page 13 and 14:
11 CHAPTER II CHAPTER I Pakistani r
Page 15 and 16:
Bangladesh is not a signatory to th
Page 17 and 18:
2. RESETTLEMENT In practice, resett
Page 19 and 20:
• Children and adolescents at ris
Page 21 and 22:
19 CHAPTER II CHAPTER I in Iraq and
Page 23 and 24:
1. UNHCR RESETTLEMENT OPERATIONS UN
Page 25 and 26:
23 accounted for just 8% of global
Page 27 and 28:
25 world. Partnerships between acto
Page 29 and 30:
27 experts, who worked in twelve di
Page 31 and 32:
29 Access to refugee populations in
Page 33 and 34:
31 What can other resettlement coun
Page 35 and 36:
33 Australia’s Special Humanitari
Page 37 and 38:
35 At a glance • Population/GDP (
Page 39 and 40:
37 What would be your advice to tho
Page 41 and 42:
39 and required in US legislation.
Page 43 and 44:
41 strong cases for changes to poli
Page 45 and 46:
43 events, assist with translation
Page 47 and 48:
45 In view of the large resettlemen
Page 49 and 50:
47 ASIA TURKEY & MIDDLE EAST Afghan
Page 51 and 52:
49 • access to education 15 (Zamb
Page 53 and 54:
51 Mohammed, Somali refugee living
Page 55 and 56:
53 Somali refugees being 458 days.
Page 57 and 58:
55 deterioration in the asylum and
Page 59 and 60:
3. ASIA AND PACIFIC 3.1. Afghan ref
Page 61 and 62:
observers), the Contact Group works
Page 63 and 64:
61 this period, the number of camps
Page 65 and 66:
63 3.3.2. Burmese refugees in Thail
Page 67 and 68:
65 ‘geographical limitation’, m
Page 69 and 70:
67 durable solutions for recognised
Page 71 and 72:
69 school system, but high rental c
Page 73 and 74:
71 At the time of writing, UNHCR is
Page 75 and 76:
Resettlement is a coordinated activ
Page 77 and 78:
75 individual re-fugees’ living s
Page 79 and 80:
77 from UNHCR Headquarters, and awa
Page 81 and 82:
79 Chart B: Resettlement case submi
Page 83 and 84:
81 submitted within 24 hours of ide
Page 85 and 86:
83 the field office, resettlement c
Page 87 and 88:
85 a dossier basis - where the deci
Page 89 and 90:
87 made by UNHCR from 8,143 refugee
Page 91 and 92:
89 Cases of individuals or groups t
Page 93 and 94:
91 Preparing refugees to depart to
Page 95 and 96:
93 and some programmes explicitly l
Page 97 and 98: 95 Pre-departure assistance in Euro
Page 99 and 100: 97 This chapter gives an overview o
Page 101 and 102: 99 Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, Lat
Page 103 and 104: In 2004, the Commission issued a Co
Page 105 and 106: 103 contribution of EU Member State
Page 107 and 108: 105 Directive’ 2004/83/EC 29 ) or
Page 109 and 110: for the period 2008-12 were offered
Page 111 and 112: 109 • increasing the humanitarian
Page 113 and 114: For 2013, Germany, Hungary and Roma
Page 115 and 116: 113 In order to initiate relocation
Page 117 and 118: 115 related to relocation’ within
Page 119 and 120: 117 • during the policy dialogue
Page 121 and 122: 119 network-building activities by
Page 123 and 124: 121 municipalities, and their civil
Page 125 and 126: 123 The following country summaries
Page 127 and 128: 125 Country Finland France Germany
Page 129 and 130: 127 Country Norway Portugal Romania
Page 131 and 132: 129 Belgium at a glance • Populat
Page 133 and 134: Belgium Resettlement Criteria • B
Page 135 and 136: 133 Pre-departure Cultural Orienta
Page 137 and 138: Belgium counselling may be arranged
Page 139 and 140: • The new 2013 quota programme ma
Page 141 and 142: 139 Year Accepted Arrivals 2010 47
Page 143 and 144: Czech Republic 141 by representativ
Page 145 and 146: Czech Republic 143 In-country selec
Page 147: Czech Republic 145 who refugees fro
Page 151 and 152: Denmark Denmark’s Resettlement Pr
Page 153 and 154: Denmark 151 medical cases are selec
Page 155 and 156: Denmark 153 In-country selection Se
Page 157 and 158: INTEGRATION IN FOCUS: Network famil
Page 159 and 160: Denmark 157 for employment and/or h
Page 161 and 162: 159 Year Accepted Arrivals National
Page 163 and 164: Finland 161 the presence of support
Page 165 and 166: Finland 163 In-country selection Se
Page 167 and 168: 165 also include short work placeme
Page 169 and 170: Finland Evaluations Although some e
Page 171 and 172: Year Dossiers submitted Accepted (N
Page 173 and 174: France 171 Identification and Selec
Page 175 and 176: Integration in Practice Reception O
Page 177 and 178: France 175 level of French is deeme
Page 179 and 180: France 177 so to date. 15% of the h
Page 181 and 182: 179 Germany at a glance • Populat
Page 183 and 184: Germany 181 Resettlement Criteria B
Page 185 and 186: Germany 183 recognised refugees can
Page 187 and 188: Germany 185 resettlement of vulnera
Page 189 and 190: Germany Save Me activists from diff
Page 191 and 192: Strengths: Germany New Developments
Page 193 and 194: 191 UNHCR Submission categories con
Page 195 and 196: Iceland 193 In-country selection Se
Page 197 and 198: Iceland 195 assist resettled refuge
Page 199 and 200:
197 Ireland at a glance • Populat
Page 201 and 202:
Ireland 199 • The primary applica
Page 203 and 204:
Ireland 201 Dossier selection UNHCR
Page 205 and 206:
Ireland services and support for re
Page 207 and 208:
Ireland 205 Women and children at
Page 209 and 210:
207 The Netherlands at a glance •
Page 211 and 212:
The Netherlands The Netherlands’
Page 213 and 214:
The Netherlands 211 both life in th
Page 215 and 216:
The Netherlands Bhutanese children
Page 217 and 218:
The Netherlands Afghan refugees in
Page 219 and 220:
217 Norway at a glance • Populati
Page 221 and 222:
Norway 219 UNHCR Priority levels ac
Page 223 and 224:
Norway and must evidence completion
Page 225 and 226:
Norway Integration in Practice Rece
Page 227 and 228:
Norway 2013, and a total of 6,000 p
Page 229 and 230:
227 Portugal at a glance • Popula
Page 231 and 232:
Portugal Portugal’s Resettlement
Page 233 and 234:
Portugal social profile of refugees
Page 235 and 236:
Portugal phase. In Lisbon, they can
Page 237 and 238:
Portugal Evaluations The Institute
Page 239 and 240:
237 Romania at a glance • Populat
Page 241 and 242:
Romania for resettlement to a third
Page 243 and 244:
Romania Where they are arranged, 69
Page 245 and 246:
Use of the European Refugee Fund (E
Page 247 and 248:
245 Spain at a glance • Populatio
Page 249 and 250:
Spain Criteria related to integrati
Page 251 and 252:
Spain Integration in Practice Recep
Page 253 and 254:
Spain Evaluations Spain first recei
Page 255 and 256:
253 Year Accepted Arrivals National
Page 257 and 258:
Sweden appeal to governments to mak
Page 259 and 260:
Sweden In-country selection Selecti
Page 261 and 262:
Sweden refugees following activitie
Page 263 and 264:
Sweden downloaded from the project
Page 265 and 266:
263 The UK at a glance • Populati
Page 267 and 268:
UK The UK’s Resettlement Programm
Page 269 and 270:
UK In-country selection UNHCR submi
Page 271 and 272:
UK refugee-landlords relationship f
Page 273 and 274:
UK Sheffield (and Hull), Bradford a
Page 275 and 276:
Other Countries Bulgaria Bulgaria:
Page 277 and 278:
275 the Menedék Association, and t
Page 279 and 280:
Overview of reception and integrati
Page 281 and 282:
For abbreviations & acronyms see pa
Page 283 and 284:
For abbreviations & acronyms see pa
Page 285 and 286:
283 For refugees, the 1951 UN Refug
Page 287 and 288:
285 Fund (AMF) 2014-20 will unify t
Page 289 and 290:
287 about refugees’ needs to supp
Page 291 and 292:
289 It is therefore crucial that na
Page 293 and 294:
291 considerably. In the UK, munici
Page 295 and 296:
293 Some reception centres, such as
Page 297 and 298:
295 civil society organisations pro
Page 299 and 300:
297 Raising awareness about Save Me
Page 301 and 302:
299 in resettlement, and wider init
Page 303 and 304:
301 accommodation. Other programmes
Page 305 and 306:
303 civic knowledge tests, and the
Page 307 and 308:
305 Horton Housing Association/2012
Page 309 and 310:
307 pre-arrival information and pla
Page 311 and 312:
309 The practices of Member States
Page 313 and 314:
311 UNHCR Policy Development des Ev
Page 315 and 316:
313 Council of the EU, Council Conc
Page 317 and 318:
315 Report from the Commission to t
Page 319 and 320:
317 Medical Needs Conditions for re
Page 321 and 322:
319 Lack of Foreseeable Alternative
Page 323 and 324:
321 integration and voluntary repat
Page 325 and 326:
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Page 327 and 328:
325 Annex IV - Resettled refugees
Page 329 and 330:
Country Mandatory/ Voluntary Belgiu
Page 331 and 332:
42 Autrement dit mardi 2 avril 2013
show all

ICMCEUROPE WelcometoEurope.pdf (5.89 MB)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?