21.01.2014 Views

Multi-channel provisioning of public services - Department of ...

Multi-channel provisioning of public services - Department of ...

Multi-channel provisioning of public services - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The I-Plan should cover the overall goals <strong>of</strong> <strong>services</strong> rendered (i.e. reasons for providing <strong>services</strong>),<br />

resources available, and need for <strong>services</strong>. In addition to a named coordinator responsible for<br />

coordination and progress, involved stakeholders partaking in the I-Plan should be added with names<br />

and contact information. A list <strong>of</strong> necessary or preferred collaborating agencies for service delivery<br />

should also be added, even when these are not available for providing <strong>services</strong> at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

establishing the plan. A list <strong>of</strong> measures and contributions by different stakeholders, both from <strong>public</strong><br />

agencies, the service receiver and next <strong>of</strong> kin, a summary <strong>of</strong> how the different measures should be<br />

conducted, and an indication <strong>of</strong> the timeline and scope <strong>of</strong> the currently described I-Plan. Consent is<br />

needed from the service receiver so that personal information related to the <strong>services</strong> provided can be<br />

shared between the different service providers <strong>of</strong> the I-Plan<br />

4.2 Stakeholders<br />

The service receiver is defined as the patient in a health care situation or an individual receiving social<br />

<strong>services</strong>. Work related to an I-Plan is not to be commenced without the consent <strong>of</strong> the service receiver.<br />

In cases where the service receiver is not capable <strong>of</strong> providing consent, the next <strong>of</strong> kin or guardian can<br />

initiate and participate in the development <strong>of</strong> the individual plan. Kin, or other stakeholders not<br />

considered as service providers (e.g. friends or other relatives), can further be crucial as contributors to<br />

the success <strong>of</strong> planned measures if involved correctly. Figure 4 provides a stakeholder overview for<br />

the I-Plan.<br />

Figure 4 I-Plan conceptual model and stakeholder overview<br />

The <strong>public</strong> agencies responsible for health- and social <strong>services</strong> are obliged to coordinate and establish<br />

an I-Plan based on the request <strong>of</strong> any service receiver. The agency in which the I- Plan request is<br />

directed is by law required to initiate the I-Plan process, also in situations where previous <strong>services</strong> are<br />

provided by different agencies. The coordinating agency is further responsible for the coordination<br />

between service providing agencies <strong>of</strong> the individual service receiver. It might however be that the<br />

initiating and coordinating agency is not the same, as the coordination role can be decided to be held<br />

outside the initiating agency.<br />

The person given the role as the coordinator for an I-Plan is expected to act as a motivator for the<br />

service receiver. It is in the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the coordinator to ensure that all involved stakeholders<br />

have a clear understanding <strong>of</strong> the task at hand. The coordinator should act as an advocate for the<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!