Multi-channel provisioning of public services - Department of ...
Multi-channel provisioning of public services - Department of ...
Multi-channel provisioning of public services - Department of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The fact that the receiving agency is in charge <strong>of</strong> storing and updating the I-Plan makes system level<br />
coordination and monitoring problematic. The lack <strong>of</strong> networked control makes the pr<strong>of</strong>essionalization<br />
<strong>of</strong> the coordinator role more difficult from a system perspective. With the use <strong>of</strong> CCPV, real-time<br />
benchmark reporting <strong>of</strong> events within or between policy networks would be possible.<br />
The role <strong>of</strong> the coordinator is important and is widely discussed. The fact that the coordinator role is<br />
not a pr<strong>of</strong>essional one, receiving electronic process support would prove useful for the coordinator in<br />
establishing and maintaining a given I-Plan. Provided task support could include locating appropriate<br />
service providers in the area, keeping plans updated and shared between stakeholders, and checking<br />
resource availability on the fly.<br />
Having online access to the I-Plan with possible views within pr<strong>of</strong>essional systems would enable the<br />
service providers to provide holistic multi-<strong>channel</strong> support to the service receivers. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
systems could additionally share information with the I-Plan to provide updates that normally would<br />
not be shared, but that potentially could change the I-Plan <strong>of</strong> the service receiver. This could include<br />
daily logs for home care <strong>services</strong> or other interactions from service delivery that would alert other<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional groups with a different understanding <strong>of</strong> the status quo. The CCPV would further allow<br />
coordination <strong>of</strong> activities, and aid the discovery <strong>of</strong> other coordinating groups or I-Plans with similar<br />
configurations through access to reporting and a global knowledge base.<br />
From a service receiver point <strong>of</strong> view, the greatest benefit is received through having a highly<br />
functional coordination group, a motivated coordinator and informed service providers. CCPV would<br />
however in addition prove useful through providing increased mobility, and through extending and<br />
overlapping the virtual organization in a service hand-over situation when moving from one<br />
geographic policy domain to another.<br />
Having access to CCPV as a next <strong>of</strong> kin or caretaker provides updated information and the possibility<br />
to give feedback on the effect <strong>of</strong> current measures more frequently. Access to updated contact<br />
information for the coordination group and asynchronous messaging would further improve the<br />
interaction between the I-Plan and the non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional service provider.<br />
5.3 Discussion and summary<br />
As we can see from the described conceptual architecture, the citizen-centric process view is a single<br />
point <strong>of</strong> access for the citizen where it can interact with the government on currently provided<br />
<strong>services</strong>. It provides a platform for service collaboration, knowledge management and process support<br />
in the <strong>provisioning</strong> <strong>of</strong> evolving <strong>services</strong>. It supports flexible organization <strong>of</strong> providers and the different<br />
government information systems, and with that supports continuous transformation <strong>of</strong> government<br />
<strong>services</strong>.<br />
The possibility to support a virtual organization <strong>of</strong> providers and receivers is probably the most<br />
beneficial feature <strong>of</strong> CCPV to I-Plan as it is described today. Few formal processes are defined and<br />
process support is mostly focused on the meta-process <strong>of</strong> establishing a plan, and conducting<br />
coordination group meetings. As process work is mostly emergent and ad-hoc, producing data for<br />
reporting would possibly be considered as a burden, which calls for process mining (van der Aalst,<br />
2010) or similar approaches for global knowledge generation and management.<br />
Once the information infrastructure is established, it is however possible to add business process<br />
management functionality for supporting various process configurations and types. Process<br />
descriptions for customized <strong>services</strong> provided by different service providers would need to be stored<br />
within the CCPV or within the connected information systems, and need to share information between<br />
the different systems would be needed. One <strong>of</strong> the benefits crucial from the I-Plan supported by the<br />
CCPV is the fact that the virtual organization can have knowledge that can improve service delivery<br />
not available in existing systems.<br />
Looking back to the original research goal <strong>of</strong> establishing My Processes capabilities for citizens, the I-<br />
Plan as seen through CCPV is a good demonstration <strong>of</strong> the possibilities that are found within the<br />
9