Chapter / Clause / Subclause – General 22 submitters - Waikato ...
Chapter / Clause / Subclause – General 22 submitters - Waikato ...
Chapter / Clause / Subclause – General 22 submitters - Waikato ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Chapter</strong> / <strong>Clause</strong> / <strong>Subclause</strong> – 7 Policies and actions<br />
1 <strong>submitters</strong><br />
Submission summary<br />
Submitter: 56 Future Proof Implementation Committee<br />
Matter: PTP11-56.12<br />
Summary: Actions (general):<br />
The actions contained in the RPTP may benefit from having some timeframes<br />
attached to them so they can be prioritised. With 86 actions it will not be possible<br />
to complete all of them straight away - they will need to be prioritised with the<br />
most important / strategically significant being completed first.<br />
Decision<br />
Decline.<br />
It is recognised that specifying timing for actions is useful from a monitoring and<br />
prioritising perspective however, most actions in the plan are ongoing, others are<br />
periodic like annual or six monthly or simply regular when certain trigger points<br />
are met. There are a few actions that are time bound. Therefore it is considered<br />
unnecessary to add timeframes to all actions.<br />
No change required.<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> / <strong>Clause</strong> / <strong>Subclause</strong> – 7 Policies and actions / 7.1 Policy framework<br />
1 <strong>submitters</strong><br />
Submission summary<br />
Submitter: 50 Pavlovich Coachlines<br />
Matter: PTP11-50.6<br />
Summary: Policy Framework. We submit that policies that guide the review,<br />
design, establishment or enhancing of existing and prospective services should<br />
be investigated with service providers in the early stages of consultation and that<br />
these providers have access to all meetings throughout the consultation and<br />
planning process.<br />
Decision<br />
Comments noted.<br />
Council accepts there would be benefits for service providers to be involved in<br />
the consultation of a new or improved services being considered and this will<br />
occur during the strategic network review.<br />
From a legislative/procurement perspective, Council does need to be careful in<br />
such situations that consultation would not give any one supplier competitive<br />
advantage should there be a tender round pending findings of any consultation.<br />
No change required.<br />
Doc # 2072711 Page 51