Spring 2010 - Interpretation
Spring 2010 - Interpretation
Spring 2010 - Interpretation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Questioning Northrop Frye’s Adaptation of Vico<br />
2 8 5<br />
providentially foreshadowing the mind’s property, as a primordial form of<br />
delusion (SN44, “Of the Elements,” VII, XIII, LXIII; “Of the Method,” 2; Bk.<br />
II.1.ii, §1; Bk. II.5, par. 2; De Uno, Bk. I, Ch. LVII, LXIII.10, and LXXV.2).<br />
The deluded imagination of the first nations, compounded with the equally<br />
deluded imagination of the Learned (Dotti) of those same nations, sustains<br />
the belief that civility is originally imposed by someone upon someone else,<br />
with the implication—drawn emblematically by Epicureans—that outside of<br />
every particular “self” there is only Chaos (Cao; compare SN44, Bk. II.7.i,<br />
and SN30, Bk. IV.12.iii: “Last Proofs of the Truth of these Principles,” last<br />
par.). Vico’s response to such views points to a civil coincidence of the private<br />
and the common: while everyone believes or imagines himself in private as<br />
“rule of the universe” (regola dell’universo), the belief or image in question is<br />
truly common. It is common for all men to “sense” reality in private, or “in<br />
the body” (compare SN44, “Of the Method,” par. 5, and “Of the Elements,”<br />
XIII). The interstice between men is not chaos, but an order without which no<br />
communality of private utilities would ever arise. Men commonly partake in<br />
private or imaginatively in an order of things they ordinarily remain ignorant<br />
of (ibid.).<br />
What ties men together in civil society is an activity or perfect<br />
faculty that always transcends the physical imagination of men (ibid.,<br />
“Conclusion of the Work,” par. 3-4). This activity is disclosed to us as what is<br />
“for all, Jove”—namely a divined objective-form of physical motion (Riprensione,<br />
par. 1, and SN44, “Of the Method,” par. 2). Vico’s “Jove” is the heavenly<br />
boundary of our imagination and thereby of “the universe of human sense”<br />
(compare Vico Vindiciae, §6; SN44, “Of the Method,” par. 1-3; and SN44,<br />
“Idea of the Work,” par. 3-4). Above all, Jove is the defining-limit or overarching<br />
“natural royal law” (legge regia naturale) of nations: “Jove” is natural<br />
to every unified, independent civil society. The true Jove is not the mythical<br />
product but the civil limit of the imagination: the true Jove, i.e. the true<br />
God, is the Jove that Christianity recognizes in the Hebrew Bible, namely the<br />
unimaginable God of civil religion (SN44, Bk. II.3, par. 1; “Of the Elements,”<br />
XXVII; “Of the Method,” par. 5; De Constantia Philologiae, Ch. XX.113).<br />
On Vico’s account, the order we can be aware of—and are<br />
aware of as long as we remain pious (ibid., “Conclusion of the Work,” last<br />
par.)—is not limited to what we make: all artificial order depends upon and<br />
partakes in a “natural order” irreducible to words (ordo naturalis; De Uno,<br />
Bk. I, Ch. CLII.7-CLIII). Admittedly, man as union of mind and body—i.e.<br />
as a “something” individuated by the mind (cf. e.g., De Antiquissima, Ch.