Spring 2010 - Interpretation
Spring 2010 - Interpretation
Spring 2010 - Interpretation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Book Review: Aristotle’s Dialogue with Socrates<br />
3 1 7<br />
Ronna Burger, Aristotle’s Dialogue with Socrates: On the Nicomachean<br />
Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008, 320 pp., $22.50 (paper).<br />
Eva n t h i a S pe l io t i s<br />
Bellarmine University<br />
espeliotis@bellarmine.edu<br />
In Aristotle’s Dialogue with Socrates, Ronna Burger invites<br />
the reader to examine the Nicomachean Ethics with a fresh eye, and to consider<br />
that it is perhaps not the treatise that it appears to be but rather the dialogue<br />
that Plato never wrote: a dialogue between two philosophers. To structure and<br />
animate her reading, Burger introduces each chapter with quotations from<br />
various Platonic dialogues, and proceeds to show how Aristotle is concerned<br />
with many of the same issues that concerned Socrates, which are addressed<br />
across the Platonic corpus. Probing further, in her investigation and discussion<br />
of Aristotle’s argument Burger also notes the numerous times Plato and<br />
Socrates appear in the text—sometimes named directly, more often quoted<br />
without being named—and argues that these references offer a guide to the<br />
structure and argument of the Ethics. Perhaps most iconoclastically, Burger<br />
finds Aristotle, in the end, to be very much in agreement with Socrates on the<br />
biggest questions: what is virtue (or, what is the relation between knowledge<br />
and virtue), what is the highest or best life for a human being, and what is the<br />
true nature of philosophy. To come to see this agreement, however, takes a lot<br />
of work: following the details of the discussion carefully, noticing not only<br />
what the speeches declare about the highest activity of a human being, but<br />
how Aristotle’s action of writing and presenting those speeches exemplifies<br />
the activity about which he is speaking.<br />
As Burger leads us into the labyrinth of Aristotle’s text, the<br />
first impression we get from her reading is the density and complexity of<br />
the work. Nothing is as it seems. What are often taken to be the most assertoric<br />
claims, she reveals to be invitations to question. Pointing out Aristotle’s<br />
© <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Interpretation</strong>, Inc.