04.03.2014 Views

Spring 2010 - Interpretation

Spring 2010 - Interpretation

Spring 2010 - Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Book Review: Aristotle’s Dialogue with Socrates<br />

3 1 7<br />

Ronna Burger, Aristotle’s Dialogue with Socrates: On the Nicomachean<br />

Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008, 320 pp., $22.50 (paper).<br />

Eva n t h i a S pe l io t i s<br />

Bellarmine University<br />

espeliotis@bellarmine.edu<br />

In Aristotle’s Dialogue with Socrates, Ronna Burger invites<br />

the reader to examine the Nicomachean Ethics with a fresh eye, and to consider<br />

that it is perhaps not the treatise that it appears to be but rather the dialogue<br />

that Plato never wrote: a dialogue between two philosophers. To structure and<br />

animate her reading, Burger introduces each chapter with quotations from<br />

various Platonic dialogues, and proceeds to show how Aristotle is concerned<br />

with many of the same issues that concerned Socrates, which are addressed<br />

across the Platonic corpus. Probing further, in her investigation and discussion<br />

of Aristotle’s argument Burger also notes the numerous times Plato and<br />

Socrates appear in the text—sometimes named directly, more often quoted<br />

without being named—and argues that these references offer a guide to the<br />

structure and argument of the Ethics. Perhaps most iconoclastically, Burger<br />

finds Aristotle, in the end, to be very much in agreement with Socrates on the<br />

biggest questions: what is virtue (or, what is the relation between knowledge<br />

and virtue), what is the highest or best life for a human being, and what is the<br />

true nature of philosophy. To come to see this agreement, however, takes a lot<br />

of work: following the details of the discussion carefully, noticing not only<br />

what the speeches declare about the highest activity of a human being, but<br />

how Aristotle’s action of writing and presenting those speeches exemplifies<br />

the activity about which he is speaking.<br />

As Burger leads us into the labyrinth of Aristotle’s text, the<br />

first impression we get from her reading is the density and complexity of<br />

the work. Nothing is as it seems. What are often taken to be the most assertoric<br />

claims, she reveals to be invitations to question. Pointing out Aristotle’s<br />

© <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Interpretation</strong>, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!