Spring 2010 - Interpretation
Spring 2010 - Interpretation
Spring 2010 - Interpretation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3 1 2<br />
I n t e r p r e t a t i o n<br />
to divine law—that her dead brother deserves special treatment for being<br />
irreplaceable; husbands and children can be replaced, but not a brother once<br />
the parents are dead. Her loss is past repair; thus she has nothing to lose by<br />
sacrificing her life. The new principle at the heart of Antigone’s revision is<br />
that personal happiness counts against familial duty. Accordingly, divine law<br />
is relaxed in its rigor. But why, asks Ahrensdorf, does Antigone not apply the<br />
principle to other aspects of life and other sources of happiness—to marriage<br />
and children of her own? Because, he answers, Antigone loves death and the<br />
promise of immortality more than she loves life and its ordinary pleasures.<br />
Extreme piety is what brings about Antigone’s ruin.<br />
Creon is as dogmatic in defense of the city as is Antigone in<br />
defense of the family. Each believes that the gods endorse his or her opposite<br />
course of action. Each also is forced to change direction: Creon toward piety<br />
and family; Antigone toward agnosticism and despair. Creon will not push<br />
matters so far as to risk losing his only remaining son (perhaps he agrees that<br />
irreplaceable kin warrant special consideration). He relents, takes counsel<br />
from the seer Teiresias, and produces a tragedy by burying Polyneices, on<br />
Teiresias’s insistence, before rescuing Antigone, as initially planned. Rekindled<br />
piety brings doom to the house of Creon, since Haemon his son, and<br />
Eurydice his wife, both commit suicide following the suicide of Antigone.<br />
Creon leaps from one dogmatic belief to another; Antigone,<br />
conversely, moves from dogmatism to doubt. At the end of the play<br />
she does not know what the gods approve or whether they mean to reward<br />
her or punish her for her heroic obstinacy. She kills herself—or hastens her<br />
death—because she has the courage to let go of dogmatic belief and to reason<br />
about the requirements of piety and justice and the possibility of leading a<br />
life in devotion to others. Ahrensdorf applauds her openness to philosophical<br />
wonder (though little good it does her) and counts her the trilogy’s true hero.