04.03.2014 Views

Spring 2010 - Interpretation

Spring 2010 - Interpretation

Spring 2010 - Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 1 2<br />

I n t e r p r e t a t i o n<br />

to divine law—that her dead brother deserves special treatment for being<br />

irreplaceable; husbands and children can be replaced, but not a brother once<br />

the parents are dead. Her loss is past repair; thus she has nothing to lose by<br />

sacrificing her life. The new principle at the heart of Antigone’s revision is<br />

that personal happiness counts against familial duty. Accordingly, divine law<br />

is relaxed in its rigor. But why, asks Ahrensdorf, does Antigone not apply the<br />

principle to other aspects of life and other sources of happiness—to marriage<br />

and children of her own? Because, he answers, Antigone loves death and the<br />

promise of immortality more than she loves life and its ordinary pleasures.<br />

Extreme piety is what brings about Antigone’s ruin.<br />

Creon is as dogmatic in defense of the city as is Antigone in<br />

defense of the family. Each believes that the gods endorse his or her opposite<br />

course of action. Each also is forced to change direction: Creon toward piety<br />

and family; Antigone toward agnosticism and despair. Creon will not push<br />

matters so far as to risk losing his only remaining son (perhaps he agrees that<br />

irreplaceable kin warrant special consideration). He relents, takes counsel<br />

from the seer Teiresias, and produces a tragedy by burying Polyneices, on<br />

Teiresias’s insistence, before rescuing Antigone, as initially planned. Rekindled<br />

piety brings doom to the house of Creon, since Haemon his son, and<br />

Eurydice his wife, both commit suicide following the suicide of Antigone.<br />

Creon leaps from one dogmatic belief to another; Antigone,<br />

conversely, moves from dogmatism to doubt. At the end of the play<br />

she does not know what the gods approve or whether they mean to reward<br />

her or punish her for her heroic obstinacy. She kills herself—or hastens her<br />

death—because she has the courage to let go of dogmatic belief and to reason<br />

about the requirements of piety and justice and the possibility of leading a<br />

life in devotion to others. Ahrensdorf applauds her openness to philosophical<br />

wonder (though little good it does her) and counts her the trilogy’s true hero.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!