06.03.2014 Views

MISSING PIECES - Inter-Parliamentary Union

MISSING PIECES - Inter-Parliamentary Union

MISSING PIECES - Inter-Parliamentary Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THEME 2<br />

1. Transfer criteria<br />

Governments have international legal responsibilities with respect to their<br />

decisions to permit small arms transfers. Under the PoA, Section 2, Article<br />

11, states declared that they would ‘assess applications for export authorisations’<br />

according to criteria ‘consistent with the existing responsibilities<br />

of states under relevant international law’. The Agenda for Humanitarian<br />

Action, agreed to in December 2003 by State Parties to the Geneva Conventions,<br />

calls on governments to ‘make respect for international humanitarian<br />

law one of the fundamental criteria on which arms transfers are<br />

assessed’. States are encouraged to incorporate such criteria into national<br />

laws or policies and into regional and global norms on arms transfers. 4<br />

States’ obligations go beyond the duty to respect arms embargoes and<br />

make them binding within their territories. Where supplying countries<br />

make weapons and ammunition available even though they have reason to<br />

believe these may be misused, they might become complicit in the resulting<br />

armed atrocities. As pointed out by the UN Special Rapporteur on the<br />

prevention of human rights violations committed with small arms and light<br />

weapons, international law ‘could be interpreted to prohibit [states] from<br />

transferring small arms knowing they will be used to violate human rights’. 5<br />

The reports of the Special Rapporteur have pointed out that small arms<br />

availability and misuse are intimately connected, and that international<br />

standards on arms transfers must be clarified and strengthened if armsenabled<br />

abuses are to be prevented.<br />

BOX 5 IMPROVING TRANSFER CONTROLS STARTS AT HOME: NEW ZEALAND<br />

By Phil Goff, Minister for Disarmament and Arms Control, New Zealand<br />

Despite the disappointing outcome of the 2006 United Nations Small Arms<br />

Review Conference, New Zealand remains firmly committed to upholding<br />

the UN Programme of Action. The priority now should be on getting the<br />

international small arms agenda back on track. We will work with others in<br />

ensuring that this is achieved.<br />

The Programme of Action remains very relevant to New Zealand’s immediate<br />

region. Dangerous security situations within countries such as Timor<br />

Leste, Solomon Islands and Bougainville could have been much more tragic<br />

but for the progress achieved in removing and destroying firearms from<br />

their communities.<br />

The development of transfer controls regulating the trade in small arms<br />

and light weapons will help curb the proliferation of these weapons into<br />

the wrong hands. New Zealand has been active in support of the transfer<br />

control initiative, launched by the UK. We have also been an active supporter<br />

of the separate and more ambitious UK proposal on an arms trade treaty.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!