06.03.2014 Views

MISSING PIECES - Inter-Parliamentary Union

MISSING PIECES - Inter-Parliamentary Union

MISSING PIECES - Inter-Parliamentary Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>MISSING</strong> <strong>PIECES</strong><br />

conflict. 16 By February 2007 there were mandatory territorial arms embargoes<br />

in force against Côte d’Ivoire, Lebanon, and Somalia. 17 Non-state actors<br />

are also subject to arms embargoes. Currently, every state in the international<br />

community is prohibited from transferring arms to non-state groups<br />

in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone and<br />

in Sudan, as well as to Al-Qaida and associated persons. 18 Under article<br />

41 of the UN Charter, states have a legal obligation to abide by embargoes<br />

enacted by the Security Council and a duty to implement measures to ensure<br />

that persons within their jurisdiction also comply with the embargoes.<br />

Increasingly, regional instability, human rights and humanitarian law<br />

concerns motivate the imposition of arms embargoes but, for political<br />

reasons, the pattern of imposition is by no means consistent. Despite the<br />

difficulties that permeate their implementation and enforcement, the fact<br />

that arms embargoes are viewed as a necessary element of the international<br />

community’s reaction to violent conflict is significant. Even where the<br />

Security Council calls upon states to halt the flow of arms to a war or conflict<br />

zone without pronouncing a mandatory embargo, its action reinforces<br />

the idea that weapons transfers in violent circumstances are never innocent. 19<br />

There has been some progress recently to improve the effectiveness of<br />

arms embargoes. The establishment of UN investigative panels to monitor<br />

different sanctions regimes has been a major development. 20 The publication<br />

of hard-hitting panel reports documenting embargo violations has<br />

helped focus attention on the problem and pushed some arms suppliers,<br />

brokers, and private traffickers to re-evaluate the risks of engaging in such<br />

deals. The investigative panels have identified consistent problems that compromise<br />

the effectiveness of arms embargoes, such as:<br />

• lax arms export controls in supplier countries;<br />

• allies in the governments of other countries who provide cover and<br />

sometimes financing for embargoed parties; and<br />

• uncontrolled arms brokers and transport agents who will supply arms<br />

to anyone for the right price.<br />

Although UN arms embargoes are obligatory, governments and individuals<br />

that are caught in violation do not face real or punitive consequences.<br />

This is especially true of governments that serve on the Security Council,<br />

such as France during a mid-1990s scandal over arms sales to Rwanda. A<br />

range of other countries also provided arms to forces subsequently engaged<br />

in genocide. 21 Individuals who facilitate sanctions busting, including cor-<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!