Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
92 Chapter 5: <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Hall Effect<br />
result is presented <strong>in</strong> Fig.5.3. For small V one would expect the Van Hove s<strong>in</strong>gularity at<br />
half fill<strong>in</strong>g. Due to f<strong>in</strong>ite Rashba SOC it is split to f<strong>in</strong>ite energies E = ±(2t− √ 4+α 2 2 t),<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Fig.5.1 for the energy below half fill<strong>in</strong>g. If the impurity strength is <strong>in</strong>creased,<br />
a preformed impurity band is created. Us<strong>in</strong>g exact diagonalization 1 and apply<strong>in</strong>g the Kubo<br />
formalism, Eq.5.22, we calculate the SHC. Exemplarily we show the result for σ SH (E) at<br />
V = −2.8t <strong>in</strong> Fig.5.4. The SHC is strongly reduced but shows an additional maximum at<br />
energy where the preformed impurity band is located, as can be seen <strong>in</strong> comparison with<br />
the DOS, Fig.5.4(b).<br />
Toanalyze thereduction <strong>of</strong>SHCfor agiven fill<strong>in</strong>gn, wevary theimpuritystrength<br />
up to V = −5t and keep the concentration constant at 10%. Similar to the results <strong>in</strong> the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> block distribution <strong>of</strong> impurity strength, we see a monotone suppression at all fill<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />
even <strong>in</strong> the preformed impurity band, Fig.5.5.<br />
5.3.2 Kernel Polynomial Method<br />
The numerical calculations presented <strong>in</strong> the previous section, which were based<br />
on exact diagonalization us<strong>in</strong>g LAPACK[LAP] rout<strong>in</strong>es, are limited to small system sizes.<br />
This leads to f<strong>in</strong>ite size effects like oscillations <strong>in</strong> the SHC, e.g. Fig.5.4(b) above half fill<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
For further calculations concern<strong>in</strong>g the role <strong>of</strong> the impurity band it is necessary to do a<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ite size scal<strong>in</strong>g analysis and consider system-sizes beyond L = 64 which makes an exact<br />
treatment on current hardware impossible: for a D-dimensional matrix such a calculation<br />
requires memory <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> D 2 , and the LAPACK rout<strong>in</strong>e scales as D 3 .<br />
Another problem is the adjustment <strong>of</strong> the cut<strong>of</strong>f η, see Eq.(5.22), which has to be taken<br />
with care as analyzed e.g. by Nomura et al., Ref.[NSSM05].<br />
Toovercome thelimitation onsmall systems, therearedifferent numerical order-Dmethods.<br />
Oneprocedureisthetimeevolution projection methoddevelopedbyTanakaandItoh[TI98],<br />
which was already used to calculate SHC[MMF08, MM07]. However, the algorithm requires<br />
both the choice <strong>of</strong> a sufficient number <strong>of</strong> time steps and an adjustment <strong>of</strong> cut<strong>of</strong>f η. A more<br />
effective method, which uses Chebyshev expansion based on Kernel Polynomial Method,<br />
will be presented <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
1 us<strong>in</strong>g LAPACK[LAP] and OpenMP[OMP] <strong>in</strong> C++