Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
58 Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Relaxation <strong>in</strong> Conf<strong>in</strong>ed Systems<br />
all wave vectors, K = Q/Q SO , is given by<br />
with<br />
E B,2D,1 /D e Q 2 SO<br />
= 1+K 2 x, (3.100)<br />
E B,2D,2 /D e Q 2 SO<br />
= E B,2D,1 + f 1<br />
E B,2D,3/4 /D e Q 2 SO = E B,2D,1 − 1 2<br />
+ 1 6<br />
f 1/3<br />
2<br />
− 1 3 f1/3 2 , (3.101)<br />
(<br />
1±i<br />
√<br />
3<br />
)<br />
f1<br />
f 1/3<br />
2<br />
(<br />
1∓i √ 3<br />
)<br />
f 1/3<br />
2<br />
, (3.102)<br />
f 1 = ˜B 2 −4Kx 2 −1, (3.103)<br />
( √3 √ )<br />
f 2 = 3 108Kx 4 +f3 1 −18K2 x , (3.104)<br />
˜B = gµ B B/D e Q 2 SO, (3.105)<br />
Thus, there are sp<strong>in</strong> states with the same real part <strong>of</strong> the Cooperon energy, so that they<br />
decay equally <strong>in</strong> time, but the imag<strong>in</strong>ary part is different, so that they precess with different<br />
frequencies around the magnetic field axis. A significant change <strong>of</strong> the Cooperon spectrum<br />
appears when gµ B B/D e exceeds Q 2 SO<br />
, as can be seen <strong>in</strong> Fig.3.16(b). All states with a low<br />
decay rate do precess now, due to a f<strong>in</strong>ite imag<strong>in</strong>ary value <strong>of</strong> their eigenvalue. Associated<br />
with this change is also a change <strong>of</strong> the dispersion <strong>of</strong> the real part <strong>of</strong> E B,2D,3 which changes<br />
for K y = 0 from a nearly quadratic dispersion <strong>in</strong> K x , a 0 + a 1 K 2 x for ˜B < 1 to one which<br />
changes more slowly as a 0 +a 1 K 2/3<br />
x +a 2 K 4/3<br />
x +a 3 K 2 x for ˜B ≥ 1 [see Fig.3.16 (a)].<br />
Weak Field<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> a weak Zeeman field, ˜B ≪ 1, the s<strong>in</strong>glet and triplet sectors are<br />
still approximately separated. A f<strong>in</strong>ite ˜B ≪ 1 lifts however the energy <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>glet mode<br />
to E B,2D,2 (K = 0)/D e Q 2 SO<br />
= ˜B 2 /2 + O(˜B 4 ), thus the s<strong>in</strong>glet mode atta<strong>in</strong>s a f<strong>in</strong>ite gap,<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a f<strong>in</strong>ite relaxation rate. The absolute m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>of</strong> two <strong>of</strong> the triplet<br />
modes is also lifted by E B,2D,2 (K = ± √ 15/4)/D e Q 2 = 7/16 + (3/4) ˜B 2 SO<br />
+ O(˜B 4 ), while<br />
their value is <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>of</strong> ˜B at K = 0. In contrast, the m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>of</strong> the triplet mode<br />
E B,2D,3 , whichapproachesE T+ <strong>in</strong>thelimit<strong>of</strong>nomagneticfield(seeFig.3.4)isdim<strong>in</strong>ishedto<br />
E B,2D,3 (K = 0)/D e Q 2 = 2− ˜B 2 SO<br />
/2+O(˜B 4 ). So, <strong>in</strong> summary, a weak Zeeman field renders<br />
all four Cooperon modes gapfull and that gap can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as a f<strong>in</strong>ite relaxation rate