11.03.2014 Views

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5: <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Hall Effect 99<br />

the case where time-reversal and sp<strong>in</strong>-rotational symmetry are preserved, i.e. unitary and<br />

orthogonal universality class are present, the scal<strong>in</strong>g function[AALR79]<br />

β(g) = dln(g)<br />

dln(L) , (5.45)<br />

where g is the dimensionless conductivity, L the side length <strong>of</strong> our system, scales like<br />

β(g) ≈ − 1 g<br />

(5.46)<br />

for large g, which means that all macroscopic systems are <strong>in</strong>sulators. Here we used the<br />

scal<strong>in</strong>g parameter g = E Th /∆ LS , where E Th = D e /L 2 is the Thouless energy and ∆ LS =<br />

1/(ρ EF L 2 ) the typical energy level spac<strong>in</strong>g. However, Hikami et al. could show <strong>in</strong> Ref.<br />

[HLN80] that if the universality class changes from orthogonal to symplectic, a MIT can<br />

appear <strong>in</strong> a 2D system. Because SOC breaks sp<strong>in</strong> rotation symmetry one can show that<br />

SO <strong>in</strong>teraction can enhance the localization length ξ drastically.[AT92, KKA10, SST05]<br />

Recall<strong>in</strong>g results from transfer matrix calculations <strong>of</strong> the Anderson model <strong>in</strong> 2D with SOC,<br />

the critical disorder strength V c for the MIT is for strong Rashba SOC α 2 = 1t given by<br />

V c ≈ 6.3t[SST05, And89] and for weaker SOC α 2 = 0.1t given by V c ≈ 4.6t[SST05]. As a<br />

first application <strong>of</strong> the KPM we use the typical DOS,<br />

ρ typ (E) = exp[〈〈log(ρ i (E))〉〉], (5.47)<br />

<strong>in</strong> comparison to the local DOS<br />

ρ i (E) = 1 D<br />

D−1<br />

∑<br />

k=0<br />

|〈i|k〉| 2 δ(E −E k ), (5.48)<br />

as an <strong>in</strong>dicator for the metallic or <strong>in</strong>sulat<strong>in</strong>g regime. In contrast to the arithmetic mean <strong>of</strong><br />

ρ i , ρ avr (E) = 〈〈ρ i (E)〉〉, the geometric mean is suppressed until it vanished for V > V c : The<br />

impurity is added to the Hamiltonian by add<strong>in</strong>g the term H imp = ∑ iσ ǫ ic † iσ c iσ where the<br />

ǫ i are uniformly distributed between [−V/2,V/2]. In the follow<strong>in</strong>g we consider the Fermi<br />

energy to be at half-fill<strong>in</strong>g. In the metallic regime we have ρ = 1/(L 2 ∆ B ) at all sites,<br />

therefore we expect exp[〈〈log(ρ i (E))〉〉]/〈ρ〉 = 1.<br />

In contrast, be<strong>in</strong>g deeply <strong>in</strong> the localized regime the states decay exponentially on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!