Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 2: <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Dynamics</strong>: Overview and Analysis <strong>of</strong> 2D Systems 9<br />
where we set the gyromagnetic ratio γ g = 1. E = −∇ϕ, is an electrical field, and B SO (p) =<br />
µ B /(2m e0 c 2 )p×E. Substitution <strong>in</strong>to the Heisenberg equation yields the Bloch equation <strong>in</strong><br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> sp<strong>in</strong>-orbit <strong>in</strong>teraction:<br />
∂ t ŝ = ŝ×B SO (p), (2.7)<br />
so that the sp<strong>in</strong> performs a precession around the momentum dependent sp<strong>in</strong>-orbit field<br />
B SO (p). It is important to note, that the sp<strong>in</strong>-orbit field does not break the <strong>in</strong>variance<br />
under time reversal ( ŝ → −ŝ,p → −p ), <strong>in</strong> contrast to an external magnetic field B.<br />
Therefore, averag<strong>in</strong>g over all directions <strong>of</strong> momentum, there is no sp<strong>in</strong> polarization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
conduction electrons. However, <strong>in</strong>ject<strong>in</strong>g a sp<strong>in</strong>-polarized electron with given momentum p<br />
<strong>in</strong>to a translationally <strong>in</strong>variant wire, its sp<strong>in</strong> precesses <strong>in</strong> the sp<strong>in</strong>-orbit field as the electron<br />
moves through the wire. The sp<strong>in</strong> will be oriented aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial direction after it<br />
moved a length L SO , the sp<strong>in</strong> precession length. The precise magnitude <strong>of</strong> L SO does not<br />
only depend on the strength <strong>of</strong> the sp<strong>in</strong>-orbit <strong>in</strong>teraction but may also depend on the<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> its movement <strong>in</strong> the crystal, as we will discuss below.<br />
2.3.2 <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Diffusion Equation<br />
Translational <strong>in</strong>variance isbroken bythepresence<strong>of</strong>disorderdueto impuritiesand<br />
lattice imperfections <strong>in</strong> the conductor. As the electrons scatter from the disorder potential<br />
elastically, their momentum changes <strong>in</strong> a stochastic way, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> diffusive motion. That<br />
results <strong>in</strong> a change <strong>of</strong> the the local electron density ρ(r,t) = ∑ α=± | ψ α(r,t) | 2 , where<br />
α = ± denotes the orientation <strong>of</strong> the electron sp<strong>in</strong>, and ψ α (r,t) is the position and time<br />
dependent electron wave function amplitude. On length scales exceed<strong>in</strong>g the elastic mean<br />
free path l e , that density is governed by the diffusion equation<br />
∂ρ<br />
∂t = D e∇ 2 ρ, (2.8)<br />
where the diffusion constant D e is related to the elastic scatter<strong>in</strong>g time τ by D e = v 2 F τ/d D,<br />
wherev F is the Fermi velocity, and d D the diffusion dimension 1 <strong>of</strong> the electron system. That<br />
diffusion constant is related to the mobility <strong>of</strong> the electrons, µ e = eτ/m e by the E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong><br />
relation µ e ρ = e2νD e , where ν is the density <strong>of</strong> states (DOS) per sp<strong>in</strong> at the Fermi energy<br />
E F and m e the effective electron mass.<br />
1 d D can have a fractal value e.g. on quasi-periodic lattices