11.03.2014 Views

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

64 Chapter 3: WL/WAL Crossover and <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Relaxation <strong>in</strong> Conf<strong>in</strong>ed Systems<br />

1.4<br />

1.6<br />

∆σ/( 2e2<br />

2π )<br />

1.8<br />

2.0<br />

2.2<br />

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0<br />

B/H S<br />

Figure 3.18: The magnetoconductance ∆σ(B) <strong>in</strong> a magnetic field perpendicular to the<br />

quantumwell, whereitscoupl<strong>in</strong>gviatheZeemantermisconsideredbyexact diagonalization<br />

while its effect on the orbital motion is considered effectively by the magnetic phase-shift<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rate 1/τ B (W) for wire width Q SO W = 1, dephas<strong>in</strong>g rate 1/τ ϕ = 0.06D e Q 2 SO<br />

, and elasticscatter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rate 1/τ = 4D e Q 2 SO<br />

. The strength <strong>of</strong> the contribution <strong>of</strong> the Zeeman term is<br />

varied by the material-dependent factor ˜g = gµ B H s /D e Q 2 SO<br />

<strong>in</strong> the range ˜g = 0...1.5 <strong>in</strong><br />

steps <strong>of</strong> 0.5: The system changes from positive magnetoconductivity (˜g = 0, green) to<br />

negative one (˜g = 0.5...1.5, cont<strong>in</strong>uous decrease <strong>of</strong> the absolute m<strong>in</strong>imum).<br />

3.6 Conclusions<br />

In conclusion, <strong>in</strong> wires with sp<strong>in</strong>-conserv<strong>in</strong>g boundaries and a width W smaller<br />

than bulk sp<strong>in</strong> precession length L SO , the sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation due to l<strong>in</strong>ear Rashba SO coupl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is suppressed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation rate (1/τ s )(W) = (π 2 /3)(W/L SO ) 2 (1/τ s ),<br />

where 1/τ s = 2p 2 F α2 2 τ. The enhancement <strong>of</strong> sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation length L s = √ D e τ s (W)<br />

can be understood as follows: The area an electron covers by diffusion <strong>in</strong> time τ s is<br />

WL s . This sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation occurs if that area is equal L 2 SO,[Fal03] which yields 1/L 2 s ∼<br />

1/D e τ s ∼ (W/L SO ) 2 /L 2 SO, <strong>in</strong> agreement with Eq.(3.81). For larger wire widths, the exact<br />

diagonalization reveals a nonmonotonic behavior <strong>of</strong> the sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation as function<br />

<strong>of</strong> the wire width <strong>of</strong> the long-liv<strong>in</strong>g eigenstates. The sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation rate is first enhanced<br />

before it is suppressed as the widths W is decreased. The longest liv<strong>in</strong>g modes<br />

are found to exist at the boundary <strong>of</strong> wide wires. S<strong>in</strong>ce we identified a direct transformation<br />

from the sp<strong>in</strong>-diffusion equation to the Cooperon equation, we could show that<br />

these edge modes affect the conductivity: the 0-mode approximation overestimates the<br />

conductivity for larger wire widths Q SO W > 1 s<strong>in</strong>ce it does not take <strong>in</strong>to account these<br />

edge modes. They add a larger contribution to the negative triplet term <strong>of</strong> the quantum

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!