11.03.2014 Views

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

Itinerant Spin Dynamics in Structures of ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 Chapter 4: Direction Dependence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> Relaxation and Diffusive-Ballistic Crossover<br />

can also support the method proposed <strong>in</strong> Ref.[SKK + 08] -to determ<strong>in</strong>e the relative strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rashba and Dresselhaus SOC from WL/WAL measurements without fitt<strong>in</strong>g parameterswith<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> cubic Dresselhaus term for wire directions different from [100] and [010]<br />

<strong>in</strong> an analytical manner.<br />

In the (110) system the situation is different: In the 2D case it was shown by Pikus et al.,<br />

Ref.[HPB + 97], that <strong>in</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> the Rashba terms the negative magnetoconductivity<br />

cannot be observed. In the case <strong>of</strong> a wire geometry we can conclude from Eqs.(4.41-4.46)<br />

that we have no width dependence if Rashba SOC vanishes. A change <strong>of</strong> the quantum<br />

correction to the static conductivity therefore cannot be achieved <strong>in</strong> this wire geometry by<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g the wire width. The reason is the vector potential <strong>in</strong> the boundary condition,<br />

Eq.(4.40), which only depends on the Rashba SOC.<br />

4.5 Diffusive-Ballistic Crossover<br />

In the follow<strong>in</strong>g we assume a (001) 2D system with both, Rashba and l<strong>in</strong>ear and<br />

cubic Dresselhaus SO coupl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Experiments measur<strong>in</strong>g WL <strong>in</strong> diffusive quantum wires with SOC[LSK + 07, SGB + 09] are <strong>in</strong><br />

great agreement with theoretical calculations by S. Kettemann, Ref.[Ket07]. But consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />

e.g. the works Ref.[KKN09, KHG + 10], one realizes that the scope <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> the<br />

theory has to be extended to describe also the crossover to the ballistic regime, l e > W. In<br />

Fig.4.3 we show an example <strong>of</strong> an experiment done by Kunihashi et al.[KKN09]. The l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

show a fit us<strong>in</strong>g Eq.(10) <strong>in</strong> the paper by S. Kettemann[Ket07] which is equal to the results<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Sec.4.2.2 if the width dependence <strong>of</strong> the term due to cubic Dresselhaus SOC<br />

is neglected. To get the solid l<strong>in</strong>es the term due to cubic Dresselhaus SOC was neglected,<br />

the dashed <strong>in</strong>clude it. When check<strong>in</strong>g Fig.4.3 (a) the condition l e < W is not fulfilled at all<br />

wire width. It follows that this additional term is suppressed if the condition <strong>of</strong> a diffusive<br />

system does not hold anymore.<br />

We have shown <strong>in</strong> Sec.4.2.2 that the presence <strong>of</strong> cubic Dresselhaus SOC <strong>in</strong> the<br />

sample leads to a f<strong>in</strong>ite sp<strong>in</strong> relaxation even for wire widths Q SO W ≪ 1, regardless <strong>of</strong> the<br />

boundary direction <strong>in</strong> a (001) system. To account for the ballistic case we have to modify<br />

the derivation <strong>of</strong> the Cooperon Hamiltonian, Eq.(4.5). In the case <strong>of</strong> a wire where the mean

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!