Improving the identification, handling and storage of âdifficultâ seeds ...
Improving the identification, handling and storage of âdifficultâ seeds ...
Improving the identification, handling and storage of âdifficultâ seeds ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4. RBG Kew species analysis<br />
<strong>Improving</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>identification</strong>, <strong>h<strong>and</strong>ling</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>storage</strong> <strong>of</strong> “difficult” <strong>seeds</strong>:<br />
Species Analysis<br />
Ms. Vanessa Bertenshaw<br />
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew<br />
Abstract<br />
In order to get some idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent to which “difficult” species cause problems for gene banks,<br />
we analyzed several databases to produce a combined list <strong>of</strong> 768 species. 80% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species<br />
produced desiccation-tolerant (‘orthodox’) <strong>seeds</strong>. A fur<strong>the</strong>r 15% are probably orthodox but may<br />
need fur<strong>the</strong>r investigation. Only 5% are definitely or likely desiccation-intolerant (‘recalcitrant’)<br />
species. Several species from <strong>the</strong> Poaceae family present difficulties due to dormancy. Relative<br />
longevity values for 39 ITPGRFA Annexe 1 species are presented.<br />
What do we mean by “difficult” <strong>seeds</strong>?<br />
▪ Inherently difficult<br />
- recalcitrant or intermediate <strong>seeds</strong><br />
- orthodox but dormant<br />
- orthodox but short-lived<br />
▪ “Difficult” due to poor <strong>h<strong>and</strong>ling</strong>/<strong>storage</strong><br />
- immature orthodox <strong>seeds</strong> dried too rapidly<br />
- orthodox <strong>seeds</strong> insufficiently dried prior to <strong>storage</strong> <strong>and</strong>/or stored under poor conditions<br />
- Seeds that have been damaged by insects (on-farm <strong>storage</strong>)<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study was to highlight species that were truly difficult because <strong>of</strong> <strong>storage</strong><br />
behaviour, germination requirements or inherently short <strong>storage</strong> potential, <strong>and</strong> distinguish <strong>the</strong>m<br />
from species which are “difficult” because <strong>the</strong>y have been poorly h<strong>and</strong>led.<br />
Data sets analysed for “difficult” species<br />
▪ Species listed in Annexe 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ITPGRFA (www.fao.org/ag/cgrfa)<br />
▪ Tropical Forages list (www.tropicalforages.info)<br />
▪ A list <strong>of</strong> underutilized species (Padulosi, 1998)<br />
▪ A list <strong>of</strong> leafy vegetables (Sheela et al, 2004)<br />
▪ Groundnuts, onions <strong>and</strong> tomatoes stored by CENARGEN at Embrapa genebank<br />
(www.cenargen.embrapa.br)<br />
The combined species list represents 768 species from a total <strong>of</strong> 97 families. The families with <strong>the</strong><br />
highest numbers <strong>of</strong> species included in <strong>the</strong> study are shown in Table 1. Of note are <strong>the</strong><br />
Leguminosae-Papilionoideae <strong>and</strong> Poaceae families with 210 <strong>and</strong> 143 species, respectively, in <strong>the</strong><br />
list.